answersLogoWhite

0

become simultaneously kings of England and France

User Avatar

Jamir Kovacek

Lvl 13
2y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How might Europe's history have been different if England had won hundred years' war?

become simultaneously kings of England and France


How might Europe's history been different if England had won the Hundred Years War?

become simultaneously kings of England and France


What is Europes history?

There have been thousands of years of European history, so it would be impossible to answer this question.


How might Eu ropes history have been different if England had won the hundred years war?

The king of England would also rule France. The England /French territory would conquer many more territories possibly, but the French probably would rebel against the king of England.


How has the diversity competition among Europes many ethnic groups affected the history?

to be a strong place and skill ful


What was the significance of the Hundred Years War in European history?

The Hundred Years War was significant in European history because it marked the decline of feudalism, the rise of centralized nation-states, and the beginning of modern warfare tactics. It also contributed to the development of national identities in England and France.


History of trains?

The history of trains dates back more than two hundred years ago. The very first steam train rolled over the railways of industrial England in the early 1800s.


How does the King of Brobdingnag's view English history of the preceding hundred year?

The King of Brobdingnag views English history of the preceding hundred years as a series of wars, revolutions, and power struggles that have resulted in much destruction and suffering. He criticizes England's leaders for their greed and corruption, as well as their willingness to sacrifice the well-being of their subjects for personal gain. Ultimately, he sees England as a morally bankrupt society in need of reform.


What has the author James Welwood written?

James Welwood has written: 'An answer to the late K. James's last declaration' -- subject(s): History 'Memoirs of the most material transactions in England, for the last hundred years, preceding the Revolution in 1688' -- subject(s): History 'An answer to the late King James's Declaration to all his pretended subjects in the kingdom of England' -- subject(s): History 'Memoirs of the Most Material Transactions in England: For the Last Hundred ..' 'Memoirs of the most material transactions in England' -- subject(s): History 'An answer to the late King James's Declaration to all his pretended subjects in the kingdom of England, dated at Dublin-Castle, May 8, 1689 ..' -- subject(s): History, Pamphlets, Politics and government


When do you use history or histories?

History is the singular, histories is the plural. A lot of people mistakenly use the singular when it should be the plural, however. Let me give you an example: England has a strong naval history. - England is singular, therefore 'history' is used. England and France have strong naval histories. - Two separate histories belonging to two different countries, so the plural is used. One patient's medical history, but two patients' medical histories.


What is the history of England's economy?

== ==


What is the significance of the Hundred Years War in European history?

The Hundred Years War was a series of conflicts between England and France from 1337 to 1453. It had a significant impact on European history as it led to the decline of feudalism, the rise of nationalism, and the development of new military tactics and technologies. The war also contributed to the centralization of power in both countries and reshaped the balance of power in Europe.