0
Bad. For roman patircians and for Senate he was bad ruler cause he hated nobility and having bad reputation he did resort all kind of cruelity to ensure his authority and power. He also persecuted Jews and Christians (one theory says that it was Domitian who is actual anichrist mentioned in Book of Revelations).
He did start unsucceful campaign in Dacia and caused financial disaster.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How bad was King Cnut ruler of England defeated?
Read about Cnut in full on http://www.englandandenglishhistory.com
Is China's government bad or good?
it is good and bad
Was tsar nicholas 2 a good or bad ruler?
Czar Nicholas II was the last ruler of the Romanov family dynasty that had ruled the great empire of Russia for over 300 hundred years. He became Czar of Russia at the age of 26 because of the untimely and unexpected death of his father. Not only was he not ready to fill this position, but he was not skilled in the areas of working with the common people and in government. Although Nicholas was a good leader in some areas, he lacked experience and could be controlled too easily. He experienced trials in his personal and public life as Czar of Russia.
Why are alliances bad?
It depends on the scenario, not all alliances are good and not all are bad.
What bad thing did Pizarro do?
killed Inca ruler and took over Inca empire
How was hadrin a good or bad ruler?
How was Hadrian a good or bad ruler
Is the England ruler a good ruler or bad ruler?
she is the best ruler because she loves Canadian bacon.
Why was Domitian seen as a bad ruler?
He made himself counsel and censor for life after his brother mysteriously died once he started getting power hungry he wasn't hurt by his brother he got really hurt by his older brother titus. his brother took the throne and domitian never got the throne.
Was Chandragupta maurya good or bad ruler?
Chandragupta Maurya was a good ruler. He was ruler from 322 BC to 298 BC. He died in the year of 298 BC.
What is one primary source proving Philip ii of Spain was a bad ruler?
he was a good ruler
Who were the first good emperors?
the first good emperor was domitian
Was Aurelian a good or bad ruler?
A good one, he did many things that were of great benefit to the empire
Was Montezuma ii a good or bad ruler?
yes, majority of the aztecs where happy with him.
Who were bad leaders?
British ruler, japan ruler, German ruler
Who built the domitian in rome?
You question needs clarification before it can be answered. What do you mean by "domitian"? The only Domitian that comes to mind is the emperor Domitian and he was a person, not a structure.
Is Akbar a good ruler or a bad ruler?
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
Is Alexander the Great a good guy or bad guy?
He was neither; as a ruler and conquerer, he did good things but did bad things ei. killed many people when invading and conquering there country.
