0
Bad. For roman patircians and for Senate he was bad ruler cause he hated nobility and having bad reputation he did resort all kind of cruelity to ensure his authority and power. He also persecuted Jews and Christians (one theory says that it was Domitian who is actual anichrist mentioned in Book of Revelations).
He did start unsucceful campaign in Dacia and caused financial disaster.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ezra
Maxine
ViviAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How bad was King Cnut ruler of England defeated?
Read about Cnut in full on http://www.englandandenglishhistory.com
Is China's government bad or good?
it is good and bad
Was tsar nicholas 2 a good or bad ruler?
Czar Nicholas II was the last ruler of the Romanov family dynasty that had ruled the great empire of Russia for over 300 hundred years. He became Czar of Russia at the age of 26 because of the untimely and unexpected death of his father. Not only was he not ready to fill this position, but he was not skilled in the areas of working with the common people and in government. Although Nicholas was a good leader in some areas, he lacked experience and could be controlled too easily. He experienced trials in his personal and public life as Czar of Russia.
Why are alliances bad?
It depends on the scenario, not all alliances are good and not all are bad.
What bad thing did Pizarro do?
killed Inca ruler and took over Inca empire
