Were the changes made to french government inevitable?

Answer 1

Answer 1

France has had over 20 regimes in the last three centuries. Some of the changes were inevitable, such as the French Revolution of 1789 that removed the monarchy due to the discontent of the average person. Some of those changes were not inevitable, but highly likely, such as the capitulation of Second Empire of France with the capture of Napoleon III at the Battle of Sedan instead of continuing with a new emperor, which could easily have happened if anyone was interested in preserving the Empire. Some of those changes were not even necessary, but the French people chose them, such as the revision of the Fourth Republic Constitution to create the Fifth Republic Constitution. They completely changed the government to convince Charles de Gaulle to become President, not because there was any serious flaw with the Fourth Republic Constitution.

Answer 2

Concerning the French Revolution of 1789, the changese were inevitable because of the horrible treatment that members of low classes were receiving. It was basically impossible for low classes to actually enjoy their lives and there was virtually no way for people born into low class families to rise to another class. The only they could, would be through marriage and all high class people thought they were too good for low class people. The government did not help this situation they didn't provide the poor with jobs, everyone had to do whatever the king wanted them to. The change in government could not be put off much longer because eventually the lower classes had to realise how unfair their lives were and how they were working so hard for so little yet the higher classes were doing basically nothing and receiving so much in return. As time went on, they finally decided they had had enough.

Answer 2

No, it was not necessarily unavoidable. Nothing is unavoidable until it happens! It could have been avoided had Louis XVI been man enough to resist the influence and machinations of the court nobles and to rein in his extravagant wife. The king did the right thing to hire competent finance ministers like Turgot and Necker who suggested a package of reforms that, if prudently implemented could have averted revolution in 1789.

On the contary, it can be argued that revolution was certain to happen and therefore unavoidable. Louis XVI mounted the throne in 1789 when and inherited a situation that was ripe for revolution. The political and social grievances of the Ancient Regime plus the financial crisis all pointed towards revolution. Under the circumstances, it can be argued that there was little, if anything that Louis XVI could have done to avoid revolution in 1789. it was unavoidable.

Raymond

Answer 3

I think its your mom isn'yt kind of avious

Answer 4

yes