The argument intended to settle international debates following World War I was primarily centered around the establishment of the League of Nations. Proposed by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, the League aimed to promote collective security and diplomatic resolution of conflicts to prevent future wars. It sought to address issues through negotiation rather than militaristic confrontation, reflecting Wilson's belief in self-determination and international cooperation. However, the League ultimately struggled with enforcement and participation, particularly due to the absence of the United States.
The Dawes Plan was intended to settle international debts from World War I. The Dawes Plan of 1924 was formulated to take Weimar Germanyout of hyperinflation and to return Weimar's economy to some form of stability.
Use of war to settle disputes
Use of war to settle disputes
John Batman is regarded as the founder of Melbourne, and therefore the first European to settle there.
They settled in the Netherlands
dawes plan .
The Dawes Plan was intended to settle international debts from World War I. The Dawes Plan of 1924 was formulated to take Weimar Germanyout of hyperinflation and to return Weimar's economy to some form of stability.
Probably not, but it helps after an argument is settled.
agreement???
Arbitrate (<~ Nove Net )
ROMULUS
When did the deboters settle in
Social science cannot settle debates on philosophical or ethical questions, such as the existence of free will or the definitions of right and wrong. These issues are often subjective and open to interpretation, making them outside the realm of empirical testing that social science relies on.
the opposite of fight is to agree or to settle an argument ~ Car :)
The twin brothers reached a compromise and decided to settle in a location that satisfied both of their preferences.
To settle an argument means to resolve or bring it to a conclusion by finding a resolution that satisfies all parties involved. It often involves compromise, understanding, and reaching a solution that addresses the root cause of the disagreement.
Not scrawny