Nationalism plays a significant role in contemporary global conflicts, often fueling tensions between ethnic, cultural, or national groups. It can exacerbate existing grievances, leading to a rise in separatist movements or territorial disputes, as seen in regions like Ukraine and the Balkans. Furthermore, nationalism can hinder diplomatic efforts by prioritizing national interests over collaborative solutions. Overall, while nationalism can foster unity within a group, it frequently contributes to divisions and conflicts on a larger scale.
It was an attack on American people, which happened on American soil. Thousands of regular citizens, as well as responders and military died as a result.
it does because it helps allot of people nowadays get there head around things:)
In the 17th century, the English Civil War (a set of three distinct conflicts occurring between 1642 and 1651) led in several ways to the system of government that the United Kingdom (or, England) has today. The most important result of the Civil War was the formal limitation of monarchical power in England: no longer would English kings rule absolutely; henceforth, their rule would be counter-balanced (and otherwise limited) by the English Parliament.
Because many historical events are struggles/ competitions/ battles/ conflicts/ etc. That means that there will be a winner and loser (not always as black and white as that). When the winner is recognized as a winner/ victor, he is allowed to tell his side of the story. Essentially, only half of history exists today.
Racial prejudice
to many
Prejudice didn't end. People still exhibit prejudice today. Prejudice means you are pre- judging someone before you really get to know them.
Most of the time, the US likes to take action.
Genocide sporadically breaks out in various war conflicts around the world, even up to today.
Disagree such tradgedies have occured since then and there is nothing to suggest that they will stop.
Yes and not only in America
Religion!
The conviction of Tom Robinson was a result of racial prejudice and bias in the justice system at that time. Presenting the same evidence to a jury today would likely result in a different outcome, given the increased awareness and advocacy for equality and justice for all individuals.
Peter Griffin And The Chicken
None.
small disputes, men