An empire is a country, state, or region.
An emperor is the ruler over the empire.
leader is a person who is in control of an organization or group of people, where as an emperor is a man who rules an empire or is the head of the state.
Besides the gender difference, an emperor has more power
kingdom= a country,state, or territory ruled by a king or queen, one country ruled by a king, inside an empire empire= several countries ruled by 1 emperor, large group of countries under 1 ruler hope that answers ur question :)
empire
In the Roman Empire the emperor was the highest leader of the land. It comes from the word "imperator" which was used to describe a great general. Leaders started using "imperator" to describe themselves and so it became the name of their position.
a city state does not have an emperor the difference between a city-state and an empire is that a city-state does not have an emperor
leader is a person who is in control of an organization or group of people, where as an emperor is a man who rules an empire or is the head of the state.
The difference between an Emperor and a President is that an Emperor is the male sovereign or supreme ruler of an empire and a President is the elected head of a republican state.
An empire is a large political entity consisting of different territories, nations, and peoples, usually ruled by a single authority or monarch. A city-state, on the other hand, is a sovereign state consisting of a city and its surrounding territory, often with its own government and independence. City-states are generally smaller and more localized compared to empires.
Besides the gender difference, an emperor has more power
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
Kingdom is the geographical boundaries where a King reigns while an Empire is reign over many regions or other kingdoms brought under reign outside the kingdom by an Emperor.
the difference between is that the empoer is older and wise
The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.
Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.
Nothing, they are both royalty.
One of the differences is that the US is not an empire, it is a country. An empire is a region ruled by an emperor. The US doesn't have an emperor. Yet.