Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
well, aside from being a part of China since the yuan dynasty (13th centry), Tibet is reconized as a city of China. Your question its basicly like what claim the US have for New YorkChina saw land and resource opportunity for themselves to take over Tibet. They knew that no one was going to stop them in invading Tibet.
no
In the 1700s France and England were in conflict over which of them would control North America. There were multiple battles over the years that lead to an all-out war in 1754.
1. Conflict over land.2. Religious Freedom3. Quaker beleif
historical change
Tibet and Okinawa used to be part of china
the country that took over Tibet is china
China is the neighboring country that took over Tibet in 1950. Tibet had previously, in 1913, declared itself independent from China.
Pakistan has not taken over Tibet . They are both independent countries
Revisionist or conflict perspective in historiography means that historical perspectives change over time and are dependent on biases of the writer.
China took over Tibet in 1951
Tibet is not free because China took it over.
In 1950, shortly after Mao Zedong came to power, the People's Liberation Army invaded and occupied the Eastern regions of Tibet, claiming that its territory was rightfully part of China. This began a disagreement between China and Tibet that lasts to this day over the sovereignty of Tibet.
Tibet is an inalienable part of Chinese territory since the 13th century.
The Dalailama was forced to escape from Tibet over the Himalayas to India as the Chinese invaded Tibet
PAKISTAN
Shadow Over Tibet Stories in Exile - 1995 was released on: USA: 1995 (TV premiere)