The Europeans didn't subdue African into slavery. They did it for themselves. The more powerful African tribes and nations subdued the less powerful nations and tribes into slavery. The Europenas , Portuguese, Spanish, French, Dutch & British, bought these slaves from their African slave masters, then shipped them over to the Americas.
First Nations and Europeans primarily lived in different places during the early periods of contact, with Europeans often establishing settlements in designated areas while Indigenous peoples maintained their traditional territories. However, there were instances of coexistence and interaction, such as trade and intermarriage, particularly in regions where European settlers sought to establish relationships with Indigenous communities. Over time, these interactions led to significant cultural exchange, but also to conflicts and displacement of First Nations peoples.
By conquests from several European nations. The European nations had many firearms, and Africa and India did not have that many at all compared to the Europeans. This caused conquests and how India and Africa became part of the British Empire
Europeans had several advantages over Africans during the colonial period, primarily in terms of advanced military technology, such as firearms and artillery, which gave them a significant edge in conflicts. Additionally, Europeans had superior naval capabilities, allowing them to traverse oceans and establish supply lines. They also benefited from advanced medical knowledge, which helped them combat diseases that were often lethal to their own populations in Africa. Furthermore, the Europeans exploited internal divisions and rivalries among African societies, facilitating their conquests and colonial domination.
The African slave trade to the Americas and Europe was the result largely of wars within African tribes. Tribes and nations would war over territory or other common causes, and the victors would punish their captives by selling them into slavery. Those slaves were either sold to other tribes, or to other nations represented by slave ships from Europe.
Over 9000!
A Well-defined infrastructure.
Technological advantage. Europeans were better at metal working and had Guns. Africa back then didn't really have nations, but tribes. And these were quite happy to fight internally too. Meaning the Europeans rarely met any big organized resistance.
Yes, but they got their independence in 1865.
france
None, the taking over of nations was part of the military actions of the war.
The Europeans didn't subdue African into slavery. They did it for themselves. The more powerful African tribes and nations subdued the less powerful nations and tribes into slavery. The Europenas , Portuguese, Spanish, French, Dutch & British, bought these slaves from their African slave masters, then shipped them over to the Americas.
If you mean Delaware National Bank, it was taken over by Fulton Bank, NA.
I think that African-Americans were brought over on boats and were captured by the Europeans.
No, African states are not better off. Apart from South Africa, most African states have degenerated into poverty, warfare and chaos. Many are still under control of brutal dictators who took over when the Europeans left.
A well-defined infrastructure.
Africa.