The French Revolution gave the world a different model from the American Revolution. The American Revolution was a giving of rights taken away or an extension of rights. The Bill of Rights in the Constitution simply listed rights that various kings had previously affirmed belonged to all Englishmen. The American Revolution limited the tyranny government could do. The French Revolution on the other hand presented a violent overthrow of the old order. It was not an evolutionary change but a revolutionary change. Many revolutionary groups chose to follow the French style of Revolution. The main one was communism. The politburo was a thinly disguised committee on public safety. It served the same purpose. Stalin was Robespierre. They begin with high sounding rhetoric. It had a dream based on platitudes. It disintegrates into chaos. The dream that a people can live by platitudes keeps appearing and never works. A group takes over the government and becomes terrorist. The impact of the French Revolution has been to destroy the old order. Like the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution destroyed the old landowning nobility. All revolutions based on the French Revolution do that. Then internal corruption brings the collapse of the revolution. When no other way is seen to exist to get rid of a powerful entrenched nobility, a French revolution may occur. When the task is to prevent a return of tyranny as it was in Germany after World War 2, an American Revolution may occur.
King John VI did not object to giving Brazil its freedom because of several reasons. Firstly, Brazil had become increasingly difficult to govern due to distance and communication challenges. Additionally, the Napoleonic Wars had weakened Portugal's control over its colonies, making it impractical to maintain control over Brazil. Finally, there was growing pressure from Brazilian elites and the population for independence, leading King John VI to ultimately acquiesce to their demands rather than risk a costly and potentially unsuccessful conflict.
The practice of giving government jobs to friends and political supporters was known as the spoils system.
It means that you should not get mad at the person giving the message.
Jane Seymour died while giving birth.
By giving fundamental right to its citizens. Like right to equality, right to freedom, etc.
The key difference between equity and equality is that equality means treating everyone the same, while equity means giving everyone what they need to be successful, even if it means providing different levels of support.
He gives his mother most of the credit for giving him the support and freedom he needed to succeed.
The Americans wanted freedom from the English. The English weren't giving up without a fight thus the revolutionary war began.
Hindus do Believe in equality, but the concept of equality is slightly different. Hinduism focuses on giving a person what he or she deserves rather than giving everyone the same resources, utilisation is also ve4ry important.
Yes
Martin Luther King was trying to get equality for all the black people
by giving us freedom or extending our little freedom we have at the moment..
Oppress or oppressing is the opposite of give freedom or giving freedom. Another antonym is enslave.
Equality refers to treating everyone the same, regardless of their individual needs or circumstances. For example, giving every student in a classroom the same textbook, regardless of their reading level, would be an example of equality. Equity, on the other hand, involves giving individuals what they need to be successful, taking into account their unique circumstances and challenges. An example of equity would be providing extra resources or support to students from disadvantaged backgrounds to ensure they have an equal opportunity to succeed in school.
No. He made the Nation of Islam a mainstream group, which committed countless acts of violence and bred hate, giving the government more justification to segregate and discriminate African Americans. His Black nationalist ideology called division instead of unity and equality. Martin Luther King was much more successful and respectable.
Freedom of choice.