Normally it was a nanny,but depending on whether the mother worked. In the Victorian times not very many women worked, they were mostly housewives.
Sometimes poorer family's had to take their children to work because they could not afford to hire a nanny/ child-minder.
they used there fingers
poor
sweets har9ibos ll 444fcjhk.vjhk .
the life for children the Victorian times was cruel brutal and just plain discriminating because all children had to work
Yes they where made in Victorian times
Normally it was a nanny,but depending on whether the mother worked. In the Victorian times not very many women worked, they were mostly housewives. Sometimes poorer family's had to take their children to work because they could not afford to hire a nanny/ child-minder.
bilt homes and shelters for the poor children
Children in the Victorian times were most often happy with what they had because they had no comparison. They lived in homes with their families when they were wealthy or in crowded rooming houses if they were not as wealthy. They often had to work with their families in order to make ends meet.
they used a stove
lord shaftesbury
The slums
yes they did
They were rich and they were childeren
no
40
you looked here so you are a fairy way
yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times