Because Africans were strangers to the Americans, so they wouldn't have allies or places to hide. Additionally, the Native Americans had much weaker immune systems than Africans because Africans had developed around the same livestock that Europeans had. This made the Africans more disease resistant. Africans were also able to put up with muich more abuse, on average, than Native Americans without fainting or dying.
I think the Columbians did because the Native Americans got killed, and the Columbians got fame, riches, and new land. Who do you think?
New types of food helped many Europeans live better lives.new types of foods helped many Europeans live better lives.
The Great Migration refers to the mass movement of African Americans from the rural South to urban areas in the North and West between the 1910s and 1970s, particularly following World War I. This migration was driven by the search for better economic opportunities, escaping Jim Crow laws, and the desire for a better quality of life. However, African Americans faced significant challenges such as racial discrimination, housing shortages, and violent backlash in their new urban environments. At the same time, they found opportunities for employment in industries that were booming during the war and could participate in cultural and social movements that would shape their communities.
After World War I, Mexican immigrants faced unique challenges compared to African Americans, including increased scrutiny and discrimination as they sought labor opportunities in the U.S. While both groups faced racial prejudice, Mexican immigrants were often targeted for their nationality and associated with labor competition in agriculture and industry. In contrast, African Americans were grappling with the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow laws, which enforced systemic racial segregation and discrimination. Both groups sought better economic opportunities, but their experiences and the societal responses to their presence differed significantly.
They were slaved because since the native Americans could not handle the work because of a disease, the europeans saw that African American people could work much longer and more better.
The French and Native Americans had a better relationship than the other Europeans during the 1600's. The french lived amongst the Native's and respected their ways.
The French and Native Americans had a better relationship than the other Europeans during the 1600's. The french lived amongst the Native's and respected their ways.
No, even though europeans are reacher than African doesn't mean they're better.
Most Europeans thought that Native Americans weren't as civilized because they AKA we treated our women better than the Spanish did.
African slaves replaced Native Americans as the primary labor sources in Latin America because Native American populations experienced devastating population declines due to diseases brought by Europeans and harsh working conditions in mines and plantations. African slaves were seen as more resistant to European diseases and better suited for the demands of large-scale agricultural work. This led to the widespread use of African slaves in Latin America to meet the growing labor needs of the colonizers.
The Spanish, and in fact all Europeans, had much better military technology than the natives.because they had guns and weapons to conquer !
The Spanish, and in fact all Europeans, had much better military technology than the natives.because they had guns and weapons to conquer !
from ƝɨѕhҠѡe on yahoo answers:In the 1800's -1900's there was little understanding between Native Americans and African Americans.Firstly because generally Native Americans were an unknown population just as they are today, and African Americans were not able to freely form friendships/relationships with people outside their local area/residence. So basically they had very little contact.Secondly anywhere the 3 populations (Black, White and Native) were in close proximity, the White settlers tried to create friction between the Blacks and the Natives.For example in some areas (southern coastal US) Native Americans where paid to recapture runaway slaves. Which they did to prevent their people from being taken by the slave traders. Most people are unaware that there was an active trade in Native Americans slaves in the US. Regiments of African Americans soldiers were used to hunt and kill Native Americans. The Native Americans called them Buffalo Soldiers.The friction was created between the African Americans and Native Americans because the settlers feared if the African Americans and Native Americans united they would outnumber the White settlers and would wipe them out in an uprising.The story of Native Americans protecting African Americans slaves is not entirely true. Historically like today, Native American society did not have the "concept of difference" based on race or skin color. Difference based on skin color is a Euro concept. Tribes often extended tribal hospitality to both African American and White people who chose to reside with the tribe.Secondly the story that Native Americans protected runaway slaves and intermarried was promoted by African Americans to explain why some didn't look fully African American. It was seen as somewhat better to be part Native American than to be part White.That's why today some African Americans believe they have Native American blood, even though DNA has proven only about 2.9% African Americans actually have Native American blood..4 months ago (10-09-2011)
They were affected because as the plantations grew the African Americans were put to work more which meant that they had to get more African Americans and put the African Americans to work even harder and some of them even died
make better jobs available to African Americans
He urged better treatment of Native Americans but proposed using African laborers.