During the Russian revolutions, some people sided with the Whites due to their opposition to the Bolshevik regime and its radical policies, which many perceived as a threat to traditional values, social order, and private property. The Whites, comprising a coalition of monarchists, liberals, and moderate socialists, attracted those who favored a return to a more stable government and feared the potential chaos and authoritarianism of Bolshevik rule. Additionally, many in the military and business sectors supported the Whites, hoping to restore the pre-revolutionary status quo and avoid the economic disruption caused by the Bolsheviks' policies.
I would compare Russian popular morale in WWI to say- Japanese popular morale in 1944 in WWII.
The peninsulares would have opposed revolutions in Latin America.
Creoles
Since the establishment of the Russian State over a thousand years ago, there would be very few years when peaceful Russian citizens were not shot and killed for one reason or another. Other than the various anti-Tsarist or pro-Bolshevik revolutions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Stalinist purges and WW2, one of the remaining significant notable events would be the mutiny by the sailors of the battleship Potemkin which gained popular support from the towns people of Odessa where the ship was in port. The Tsarist soldiers were sent to put down the mutiny and supposedly opened fire on the supportive towns people, although it is claimed that the massacre did not happen. There is a movie called "The Battleship Potemkin" made in 1925 by Sergei Eisenstein portraying the events surrounding the Potemkin mutiny which is lauded as the greatest propaganda film ever made.
A large part of the peasantry disliked the Communists, but they saw no point in supporting the Whites, who they feared would restore the monarchy. The industrial workers entertained no hope from the Whites, who had shown no understanding of city workers.
Those people that were Spanish born would have been against the revolutions of Latin America.
You would use 4 medium egg whites or 5 small egg whites.
The word whites is a common plural noun. It requires no apostrophe.I put all the whites in the washer together.If the word whites has a possession or belonging, it needs an apostrophe.The egg whites' fluid was turbid and spoiled.
You where your dress whites in the summer. You can wear them at any time but it is more perferred to wear them at special events. You wear them where ever people would wear a shirt and tie.
I would say that they were either in Africa or being taken out of Africa to be slaves by the whites
They provided services that whites would not because of segregation
yes. In South Africa there was an system to separate blacks from whites. they had separate areas in which they would do the same thing but one place was for blacks another for whites. e.g a tap there would be a wall separating two areas a tap for blacks a tap for whites. this was called the "apartheid" system.
Because people refer to them as black and whites. so what other color would they paint them?
Karl Marx had no beliefs or thoughts of the Russian Revolution since it occurred many years after Marx died on March 14, 1883. The "Russian Revolution" was actually a series of three revolutions. One in 1905, which resulted in the creation of the Duva, a Russian style Parliament. The second was in February 1917, which resulted in the abdication of Czar Nicholas II, and one in October 1917 resulting in the ascension to power of the Bolsheviks under Lenin. Although Marx obviously had no opinion of the revolutions, it is obvious from his writings that the Russian Revolutions were not the kind he predicted. Marx felt the working class of the industrial nations would unite and overthrow the upper class out of economic forces, then establish a socialist political system. The Russian Revolutions were supported by a non-industrialized agrarian economy which overthrew the political system in order to impose the new economic system. In other words, the Russian Revolution, although inspired by Marxian principles was not the revolution Marx had in mind.
Both the French and Russian revolutions occurred because of two main reasons. Both of these revolutions were the direct results of bad leadership and a bad economy. These two reasons along with other factors caused both of these revolutions. Although they were both similar, they also had differences. A difference between the two is that the Russians had an unsuccessful "pre-revolution" in 1905. Another difference between these two revolutions is the fact that the French turned towards a democracy while the Russian government became communist. Both the French and Russian revolutions had similar causes but ended up with different results. Both of these countries had different internal factors which cause the results. The Russians had Lenin and the French had the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. I would also like to point out 1 more similarity between these two revolutions and that is the fact that both Czar Nicholas II and King Louis XVI were executed soon after the revolutionaries took power. It's just strange to see how two similar countries with so many similar reasons for revolting would end up with so very different governments. this is one of the differences.there were many more.
4:) fail to meet the political and economic needs of their people
4:) fail to meet the political and economic needs of their people