Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
They are using the historical method.
Historians have different interpretations due to various factors, including their individual perspectives, the sources they prioritize, and the contexts in which they study history. Personal biases, cultural backgrounds, and contemporary societal values can influence how they analyze events. Additionally, the availability and interpretation of primary sources can lead to differing conclusions about the same historical events. As new evidence emerges and societal views evolve, historical interpretations can also change over time.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
They use sources because it explains what happened and why. It also replaces paragraphs
Yes Twitter=@MalisVals ;]
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
You need sources to be able to unravel history.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Historians use various sources of evidence such as primary documents, secondary sources, artifacts, and personal accounts to synthesize information. They analyze these sources critically to develop historical interpretations and draw conclusions about the past. By comparing and contrasting different sources, historians construct a coherent narrative to present a comprehensive understanding of historical events.
Historians study the past by examining written records and other sources to understand and interpret events. They analyze primary sources, consider different perspectives, and draw conclusions based on evidence to create an accurate and unbiased account of history.
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.