0
The European allies focused on rebuilding themselves after wars, and believed that they should not have to pay to repair their nations because they did not cause the damage.
After World War one the focus was on the destruction cause by bombings, which required a lot of time, labor, and money for the allied nations to fix. They wanted Germany to cover these costs because Germany did the damage. The allies asked Germany to pay reparations and to change their governing system.
After World War two the focus was on making sure Germany was not able to be an aggressor again. Land was taken away, Germany's advanced scientific and technological industries were limited, and they had to pay reparations to the allies.
What else can I help you with?
Why might European allies have been more interested in punishing Germany than in creating a lasting peace?
The Germans had been very aggressive and brutal with everyone in WW2 so the Allies did not want to take it easy on them.~V~
Why might the European allies have been more interested in punishing Germany than creating peace?
The European allies were more interested in punishing Germany after World War I primarily due to the immense loss of life and devastation they suffered during the war, which fueled a desire for retribution. The Treaty of Versailles, which imposed heavy reparations and territorial losses on Germany, was seen as a way to ensure that Germany could not become a military threat again. Additionally, the prevailing sentiment in countries like France and Britain was that a strong punitive approach would deter future aggression, overshadowing the need for a stable and lasting peace. This focus on punishment ultimately laid the groundwork for future tensions in Europe.
What was the main conflict after World War 1 between president Wilson and our allies regarding the treatment of Germany?
After World War I, the main conflict between President Woodrow Wilson and the Allies concerned the harshness of the proposed Treaty of Versailles towards Germany. Wilson advocated for a more lenient approach, emphasizing his Fourteen Points, which called for self-determination and a fair peace to prevent future conflicts. In contrast, the Allies, particularly France and Britain, sought to impose severe reparations and territorial losses on Germany to ensure it could not threaten them again. This disagreement highlighted the tension between Wilson's idealism and the Allies' desire for security and retribution.
In what way did the Allies hold an advantage over the Central powers?
The Allies had greater miltary strength and size.
When comparing African and European colonial writing European writing usually includes less details and focuses more on the reaction of the?
It includes less detail on the cultural, and more focus on the reaction of the outsider.
Why were the European allies more interested in retribution then the US was after the war?
because the u.s.a wasnt invaded by nazis
Why might the European allies have been more interested in punishing Germany the in creating a lasting Peace?
The Germans had been very aggressive and brutal with everyone in WW2 so the Allies did not want to take it easy on them.~V~
Why might European allies have been more interested in punishing Germany than in creating a lasting peace?
The Germans had been very aggressive and brutal with everyone in WW2 so the Allies did not want to take it easy on them.~V~
Why might the European allies have been more interested in punishing Germany than creating peace?
The European allies were more interested in punishing Germany after World War I primarily due to the immense loss of life and devastation they suffered during the war, which fueled a desire for retribution. The Treaty of Versailles, which imposed heavy reparations and territorial losses on Germany, was seen as a way to ensure that Germany could not become a military threat again. Additionally, the prevailing sentiment in countries like France and Britain was that a strong punitive approach would deter future aggression, overshadowing the need for a stable and lasting peace. This focus on punishment ultimately laid the groundwork for future tensions in Europe.
Is retribution effective?
Retribution can be effective if the person is willing to admit a mistake and improve following the retribution. In most cases, rehabilitation is more effective.
Why were European allies more interested in punishing Germany then creating a lasting peace?
To repay for the damages caused and to create lasting peace by ruining Germany to a point that it no longer had the ability to wage a war.
Can you Give two examples of how the fighting in the Pacific Theater was different than the fighting in the European Theater?
2. In Europe, the U.S. was fighting more than one country and had more Allies that they could rely on.
Were Germany s European axis allies more invovled in the blitz than the battle of Britain in operation sealion?
Germany's Axis allies were not involved at all in the Blitz, the Battle of Britain or operation Sea Lion. All of those were exclusively German affairs.
Why were Europeans interested in discovering new lands and market?
During the Colonial Period, European nations were interested in discovering new lands and new trade-markets mostly for the sake of economic enrichment. That new goods might improve European lifestyles, that new lands could bring glory, that new lands and peoples could be converted to European religious views -- all of these and more were also involved in the European frenzy for discovery at this time.
How can a minor crisis between two nations end up in a European war?
The 2 nations build up allies and then the crisis becomes greater as more people are involved in it.
Whose propaganda was more influencing allies or central powers?
The Allies' propaganda had more influence.
What role did the European allies play in the American war?
The French army basically defeated the British for the untrained Americas. Spain was more help in the land that bordered Spanish territory. Without European aid, America'd be all about fish and chips and cricket.
