The Romans were happier in an empire because their ruler made a law that the roman can torture any one who goes against Cesar. In their time the Romans were the 1# torturers in their empire.
+++ Weird answer! Yes they could be very cruel but didn't have a monopoly on it. They, or at least the better-off Romans, were happy in the stable days of the Roman Empire because it gave them a well-off, ordered society, good houses, etc.
human runners
The Romans had an empire, whereas the Greeks did not. The ancient Greek society consisted of several city-states, each under their own laws. The only time they united was in a time of crisis. When the crisis was over, they all went back to their own territories. The closest thing to a Greek empire was the conquests of Phillip of Macedon and his son, Alexander the Great, but at Alexander's death the "empire" simply was divided and crumbled. The Greeks did have colonies in southern Italy, but they were colonies of Sparta, a city-state. In contrast, the Romans entered a territory, sometimes sent settlers there, and ruled the territory under Roman law, thereby attaining an empire.
APEX: Roman Catholicism remained the dominant religion.
The Western part is just called the Roman Empire or the Western Roman Empire but it would fall quickly....the east halve of the empire became the Byzantine Empire....This would also be the first great schizm and where Greek Orthodox/Eastern Orthdox is created as the second Christian religion
the main periods of french history were that it was part of a region known as gaul. the Romans established a latin-based language that developed into french.Charlemagne was the franks' greatest ruler, he dreamed of building a christian empire that would be as great as the old empire.
The Romans never conquered the Seleucid Empire.
Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.Computers and aircraft would have helped the Romans to rule their empire, big time.
The Byzantine empire was the continuation of the Roman Empire.
no the Romans thought that they were invinceable =) =) =) =) =)
The Romans profited from their empire through developing thriving trading networks and through taxation.
The Turkish muslim empire destroyed the Romans
The Romans of the eastern part of the empire called themselves Romans just as the Romans of the west. They were one people--one empire. The term "Byzantine" is a term coined by historians to differentiate between the two sections of the empire.
they fought for it
i dont no
soldiers
Argument could be made for both sides but i believe the romans
The Romans did not invent the battering ram, rather it was the Assyrian Empire. Tudiya was the first king of the empire.