The ending of "The Giver" can be interpreted as an ambiguous conclusion that suggests the possibility of both hope and uncertainty. Jonas' decision to leave the community indicates a desire for freedom and a search for a better way of life, but the fate of the characters and the ultimate outcome of his journey remain open to interpretation, leaving the reader to imagine the future for themselves.
One possible way to change the ending of "The Giver" could be to leave it more open-ended, allowing readers to interpret Jonas' fate for themselves. Another approach could be to have Jonas return to the community after escaping, to try and bring about change from within. Alternatively, the ending could focus more on the consequences of Jonas' actions and how they impact the community.
I hated it
The keyword ending of "The Giver" signifies hope and the possibility of change in a controlled society. It suggests that despite the strict rules and lack of emotions in the community, there is a chance for a better future with the memories and experiences passed on by the Giver.
The keyword "giver" in the ending of the story signifies the importance of the character who imparts knowledge, memories, and wisdom to others, ultimately leading to growth, understanding, and change.
Lois Lowry ends the book allowing the reader to have their own opinion on whether or not Jonas lives. In my opinion, Jonas lives because he goes sledding down the hill and hears something he has yet to receive from the Giver, music. However, there is also a side of me that says he dies because he finds the sled at the top of the hill, right where it was in the memory given to him by the Giver. So, there is no real definite yes or no answer, but, it's what you believe happened to him.
In the ending of "The Giver," Jonas escapes from the community with the baby Gabriel, seeking a place where they can experience true emotions and freedom. They journey through harsh conditions, facing challenges but ultimately finding hope for a better future outside the controlled society they left behind.
In "The Giver" by Lois Lowry, the protagonist Jonas runs away from the community with the baby, Gabriel, to save him from being released. They journey through harsh weather until they find a sled and sled downhill toward a place that might be Elsewhere. The ending is left open-ended, leaving readers to interpret whether Jonas and Gabriel survive and find a new life beyond the community.
As a fictional character, Jonas's sexual orientation is not explicitly defined in "The Giver" by Lois Lowry. Each reader may interpret Jonas's relationships and emotions in their own way. Jonas's deep friendship with Fiona and his bond with the Giver are central themes in the novel.
It left the book open for another book. There are two other Gathering Blue and the Messanger Jonas and Gab come into the messanger. I think Lois was refering to Jonas furture not ending but just the beging.
In Lois Lowry's novel "The Giver," Gabriel is a baby who is also known by number 36. He is a newchild who is struggling to thrive in the community and becomes the recipient of Jonas's memories to help him develop and grow. Gabriel's fate is uncertain at the end of the book, leaving readers to interpret his future.
There is not really a cliffhanger just a very unclear ending that makes you think. The ending never specifies whether Jonas and Gabriel find elsewhere. It leaves you wondering if Jonas is slipping into a memory or if he as actually found Elsewhere.
In The Giver, ambiguity refers to situations or concepts that are unclear, uncertain, or open to interpretation. This can include vague or conflicting information, as well as gaps in knowledge that leave room for multiple explanations or possibilities.