0
Communication is: a dynamic process, emergent, containing unprecedented elements, a contingent sequence of events, interactional, interpersonal, intrapersonal, subjective narratization, called thought, within an environment of ever changing situations, conditions, creating shared meaning, succeeding in its stated aims, goals, or objectives, or, failing, if meaning is not created and shared —NOT communication— by shared codes, through a verbal system of symbols, and emblems that appear to be symbolic, with a wide vocabulary and semantic sensitivity, and through a less systematized system of nonverbal behaviors and self-expressive representations, including all of the vocalics that give speech its beauty of resonance and clarity, intentionally sent, transmitted with previous knowledge of idea, desire, and hoped-for outcomes, received as intentional, derived by another as the idea, desire, or hoped-for outcome of the sender or source, consciously sent and received, fully aware of —able to articulate— the ideas, desires and outcomes at the level of speaking them, and received by others with an awareness of the level of ability of the receiver to articulate what the sender desires, believes, thinks, or wants as an outcome, face to face, in person with at least one other present, baby, man, woman, or dog, and with the potential for feedback from another with the capability of returning by word or deed the intent of the communicator. Look at the internal system that exists to support communication adding to the total complexity of this human and humanizing phenomenon which everyone needs to appreciate. Internal System Overview The Internal, Subjective System WHEW! That's a lot to ask! Is it any wonder........... Great Oratory These are the conditions that elicit great oratory, according to the ancient philosophers of communication, and, I must add, that underlie eloquence, which I look for in speaking today. Is this too much to hope for? A consumation devoutly to be wished! An able person, melding passion, intellect and history, with the freedom to speak, a high moral purpose, confronting a great issue, in a situation that demands critical and bold decision, before an intelligent and educated audience capable of judging, and with an opponent of equal skill. Who, in your opinion, among our national leaders has qualified as a great orator, performing at that high level of competence? One late night comedian-host of a talk show has a comic segment showing great speeches in our history compared to the present incumbent (of October, 2008 and the past eight years). Why does it get laughs? The dramatic contrast! Apparently such oratorical arts and skills are not valued in United States society. GIVEN ALL THAT, ANYONE WHO HOPES TO SUCCEED AT COMMUNICATION NEEDS AND SHOULD WANT TO STUDY THE ARTS AND SCIENCES OF COMMUNICATION, AND ENGAGE IN PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES TO PREPARE FOR THE WORLD STAGE. Could we say that, given its complexity and without concentrated study and practice under critical feedback, that communication, especially in the most crucial contexts, is likely to fail?
What else can I help you with?
What is mass communication by different scholars?
Mass communication is defined by various scholars in different ways. Harold D. Lasswell emphasizes the role of communication in influencing public opinion and behavior, often framing it as "who says what, in which channel, to whom, and with what effect." Marshall McLuhan famously coined the phrase "the medium is the message," highlighting how the medium shapes the experience of the message. Meanwhile, Denis McQuail focuses on the social functions of mass communication, considering its impact on society, culture, and individual behavior. Each perspective underscores the complex interplay between media, audience, and societal influence.
Who are the five different authors who defined mass communication?
Five different authors who defined mass communication include Edwin Emery, Philip H. Ault and Warren Kendall Agee. The other two are Barker and Mehta.
How can communication be defined?
communication can be defined as the process in which information is exchanged and understood by two or more people or communication can be defined as the transfer of understandable information from one person to another.
What is the definition of communication by ten different scholars?
Communication has been defined in various ways by different scholars. For instance, Claude Shannon describes it as the process of transmitting information through a channel. Wilbur Schramm emphasizes the exchange of meaning between individuals. Harold D. Lasswell views it as "who says what in which channel to whom with what effect." David Berlo focuses on the sender, message, channel, and receiver. Karl Weick defines it as the process of organizing information through shared understanding. Meanwhile, Marshall McLuhan famously states, "the medium is the message," highlighting the importance of the medium in communication. Other scholars, like Edward T. Hall, stress the role of context and culture in communication. R. Wayne Pace sees it as a process of sharing and creating meaning. Lastly, Paul Watzlawick discusses it as a fundamental aspect of human interaction that cannot be avoided. Each definition highlights different dimensions of the complex nature of communication.
What are the 9 characteristics of a civilization?
There are several different criteria of civilization, and many different versions of these criteria as defined by different scholars and theorists. Some of the most commonly agreed-upon criteria are listed here. 1. Political Organization 2. Social Classes 3. Religion and Beliefs 4. Arts and Humanities 5. Language and Communication 6. Science and Technology
What is educational practice?
Educational practice has been defined in various ways by different scholars. However, most definitions agree that this is the use of educational resources to improve the quality of education through institutional policies.
How is communication defined?
Communication is the conveying of information through the use of arbitrary signals to arrive at a shared understanding.
Why is important to having clearly defined standards?
Only with clearly defined standards can experiments be repeated and communication about results be understandable.
How do you define communication and reports?
Communication is defined to be the act or process of using words, sounds, signs, or behaviors for an exchange of information. Reports, on the other hand, is defined to be a written or spoken description of a situation of event.
What is intellectual communication?
Intellectual communication can be defined as communicating in an intellectual manner. Intellectual communication systems are used in technology and its purpose is to understand messages as well as send and receive them.
How do you judge the appropriateness of one definition of communication?
Since I do know what the word communication means, I can tell if it is correctly defined by a given definition.
Interpersonal communication and communication?
Interpersonal communication is a subset of communication. It is traditionally defined as face-to-face communication between two people. Some people prefer to define it as communication between two people who know each other very well.
