In Lois Lowry's novel "The Giver," the absence of animals in the community is a deliberate choice made by the society's leaders to maintain control and conformity. Animals are seen as unnecessary distractions that could potentially disrupt the carefully regulated environment. Additionally, the lack of animals serves to further emphasize the sterile and controlled nature of the community, highlighting the extent to which individuality and natural diversity have been suppressed in favor of sameness and predictability.
because they have never seen animals before
page 5
No, Buddhists do not sacrafice animals. But they do offer flowers and food.
because they have never seen animals before
he found rain, animals, war and snow
Because in that utopian society they have made animals obsolete. No one but Jonas and the Giver have seen an elephant.
There's no violence, no animals, no pollution, everyone is equal, no homeless people, and everyone has a job. =)
they might have been seen as something to disturb the peace in the community
She didn't have knowledge about animals so she was surprised to hear the word hippo.
She didn't have knowledge about animals so she was surprised to hear the word hippo.
In the book "The Giver" by Lois Lowry, the protagonist, the Giver, is not explicitly mentioned as being married. The focus of the story is primarily on the relationship between the Giver and Jonas, the main character.
In Lois Lowry's novel "The Giver," the Giver's real name is never revealed. He is simply known as the Giver, as is the role he plays in the community.