It all depends on your point of view but personally I'm a fan of both.
Dracula is a old movie that simply cannot be outdone in vampires because it IS the first, but Twilight does have it's perks. (although, the movie wasn't anything to be crazy about. i recommend the book better). I'm a twilight fan.
No they are not, True Blood is a much more adult programme with a lot less tweenage romance. Also, saying Twilight is better than Dracula is sacrilege, Dracula is classic literature, Twilight is not.
Dracula. Not edward cullen. None of the so-called vampires from the twilight series suffice. Count dracula ftw.
Used to be Dracula, but after the Twilight phenomenon, its definitely Edward Cullen
twilight novel is better.
ma ak27
Titanic. Anything is better than Twilight.
twilight is better.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer Movie Angle the Vampire Movie Interview with a Vampire Vampires Suck Dracula Queen of the Damned Dracula 2000 Daybreakers
Twilight
twilight
He isn't in The Twilight Saga: Eclipse. He is in Dracula though, which is also a vampire movie.
There is no question about it that Dracula has sold many, many more than Twilight. Let us bear in mind that Dracula has existed for decades, since 1897 in fact (over 118 years), therefore it has obviously sold more in those years than Twilight has in it's short life. Dracula is also the book that gave birth to the idea and the fear of vampires, so it is still massively popular today due to that fame. Dracula a classic and probably will be for the next five hundred years at least years. Twilight is just a silly teen story, and teen stories usually on average have a maximum shelf life of just 15 years (because teen expectations, tastes and attitudes are constantly changing).