Actually, they are pretty close when it comes to novel vs movie, but if you think that you only need to watch the movie to understand the novel you are wrong. In the book you get what the girl is feeling and thinking and you don't get that in the movie. When the night riders come she expresses her fears about the event, but the movie doesn't show that you to as well as the book. My favorite part in the book is when the kids dig the hole in the road for the school bus. Read the book it is better.
If however you want to note the differences, they are minor. One difference is that in the movie, Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W., and Melvin are Kaleb Wallace's children. In the book, they are the children of Charlie Simms. Another difference is that when Stacey gives his coat away to T.J. that Uncle Hammer gave him, in the book Uncle Hammer scolds him. In the movie, he is scolded by his father. Also, in the movie, Mr. Berry dies as a result of being burned by the Wallaces. In the book, Mr. Berry is severely burned and can barely move, but still alive. Additionally, in the book, T.J. gets Mama fired at the end. It happens toward the beginning of the movie. The book also shows that when Mr. Morrison goes to stop Uncle Hammer from approaching Mr. Simms about knocking Cassie in the street, Stacey is not with them, he is by the fire reading. However, in the movie Stacey goes with them to Mr. Wallace (not Simms). When the children say that they want Uncle Hammer to beat Mr. Simms up in the book, they are sent to bed early. When they say in the movie that they want Uncle Hammer to beat up Mr. Wallace, they are scolded and sit silently around the table.
These are just a few differences, why not read the book and watch the movie. It will be better. Besides . . . I'm not telling you the rest of the differences ;) only one way to find out. (Hint, hint, hint)
There is no difference, in the movie they used the same dialogue as they did in the book.
Red Thunder - novel - was created in 2003.
It's okay. See "What's the difference between A Wrinkle in Time movie and novel". The actors they picked to play the characters are AWESOME!
Do your own English essays.
they are both unjustified
Valkyrie is an illusion made by Coelo in his novel.. angels are beings..
In the "Twilight" movie, the setting is brought to life visually through cinematography and is more condensed for storytelling purposes. In the novel, there is more room for detailed descriptions of the setting, allowing readers to imagine the world in more depth. Overall, the movie provides a more visual and condensed interpretation of the setting compared to the novel.
A light novel is a style of Japanese novel that typically features illustrations and is targeted towards a younger audience, while a novel is a longer work of fiction that is not necessarily illustrated and can cover a wider range of genres and themes.
well in the novel Will is illustrated in a dispicable way. Hornby actually makes the reader hate him at the start but in the movie, because of his good looks and humour, we actually like him. Also in the book we think of Fiona as being pretty but in the movie she is actually very ugly and unpresentable.
Thul is a village near a city Bombay
i think there is not a movie for the novel beka lamb
A novel is a longer work of fiction that typically explores complex themes and characters in depth. A light novel is a shorter, easier-to-read novel that often includes illustrations and is targeted towards a younger audience or those looking for a more casual read.