answersLogoWhite

0

It should be the same as it was before. The smaller fish was not moving so it should have no effect on the larger fish's movement.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

A 5 kg fish swimming at a speed of 1 ms swallows an absent minded 1 kg fish swimming toward it at 4 ms The speed of the larger fish after lunch is?

1/6 m/s


Where can you get milky lunch bars?

At walmart and publix and at cosco (in cosco it comes in larger box and different flavors.)


What does it mean if pelicans are circling high in a group?

they are looking for their lunch that is swimming in the sea.


If the larger fish has a mass of 5 kg and swims 1 meter per second toward a 1 kg fish what is the velocity of the larger fish immediately after lunch you will neglect the effects of water resistance?

By conservation of momentum, the total momentum before the lunch equals the total momentum after the lunch. Initially, the total momentum is 5 kg * 1 m/s = 5 kg·m/s, as the smaller fish is initially at rest. After the lunch, since momentum is conserved, the larger fish will have a velocity of 0.2 m/s (5 kg·m/s / (5 kg + 1 kg)).


What is the rule for a rhombus?

It is required to use only the special drinking fountains, lunch counters, schools, and swimming pools that have been provided and are clearly marked for its use.


Have lunch or take lunch?

have lunch


Is I haven't got lunch correct English?

We did not take our lunch. We have not had our lunch. We have not taken lunch.


What did you had for lunch or what did you have for lunch is the correct phrase?

What did you have for lunch. It makes much more sense than what did you had for lunch.


What does the brain teaser exit lunch lunch mean?

Exit to lunch


Is it go to lunch or go for lunch?

Unless your lunch is literally running from you, it is "go to lunch."


What is the past tense of have lunch?

The past tense is had lunch.


What is correct breakfast and lunch was or breakfast and lunch were?

Breakfast and lunch were . . . "