well,if your talking about dogs,then yes,wolves are bigger and stronger than most domestic dogs and can bite twice as hard as a pitbull.but some dogs are bred for killing wolves so they are bigger.sometimes domestic animals are bigger but in most cases they are smaller and weaker due to selective breeding by people
No, it is the other way around. Larger animals, such as elephants, have a longer gestation period than smaller animals, like hamsters.
no, bigger animals have more bone so their stronger and can live up to foe's. smaller animals perhaps give out faster
the are animals, they have smaller brains than us, they can't talk.
No. Think of the Sahara desert. That is much hotter than a microwave and the animals that live there have not became smaller.
The prehistoric ancestor of the dog tribe was a small mink-like animal, with a long body and short legs, which lived about 40 million years ago where there were three-toed horses no bigger than a sheep.
mobile, relied on domesticated animals, and population much smaller than in agricultural societies
everything bigger than a dachshund can easily kill it. most things smaller than it can kill it too. dachshunds are helpless animals, they are ment to be a domesticated indoor dog.
true (horseisle)
true
amoebas are actually animals, therefore are animals smaller than paramecium.
they have gotten significantly smaller over time, in comparison to thier pre-historic ancestors.
No, it is the other way around. Larger animals, such as elephants, have a longer gestation period than smaller animals, like hamsters.
Pretty much all of them.
Only for some animals.
Anything smaller than it.
Because they eat smaller animals and butterflies are smaller than them.
no, bigger animals have more bone so their stronger and can live up to foe's. smaller animals perhaps give out faster