Not as much as your question implies. Less starvation and less selection for traits that conferred superior resource acquisition, but other things, such as sexual selection, would become vastly more important.
Also birth rates would fall among organisms. Use some humans somewhere as a example of unlimited food being conferred on the organism. In a limited sense no one starves, but there are other environmental stresses and sexual selection is strong among humans. The food chain among other organisms would change and perhaps less variance would occur with less birth, but other environmental factors would still be in place here.
Its NaTuRaL sElEcTiOn if you didn't know.
natural selection.
Accidental selection is the process of evolution in a subset of a species due to circumstances like a natural disaster.
natural selection
Charles Darwin is most noted for the process of "decent with modification" and the process of "natural selection".
Natural selection is only the result of changing environments, mutation and the variation resulting therein. Natural selection is the process of adaptive change and the main mechanism of evolution that leads to speciation. Natural selection is a process as mutation and variation are grist to the mill of natural selection.
Its NaTuRaL sElEcTiOn if you didn't know.
natural selection
Natural selection means survival (and breeding) of the fittest, it is key to the evolutionary process.
natural selection
Meiosis plays an important role in the process of natural selection, as it allows DNA to replicate.
The book, On The Origin Of Species, " suggested " that organisms evolve through the process of natural selection. The nonrandom survival and reproductive success of randomly varying organisms
natural selection. :)
The four stages are: Overproduction, Genetic Variation, Struggle to Survive, and Successful Reproduction
Natural selection
natural selection
natural selection