Tiktaalik's fin bones were not connected to its main skeleton, and so could not have supported its weight out of water. And the similarity between species could also reflect common design.
Answer
Isn't the modern mudskipper evidence enough?
Answer
No. Recent discovery of the prints of a four-footed animal that dates in evolutionary terms at 18 million years earlier than Tiktaalik have forced scientists to reconsider their earlier assumption that Tiktaalik represented a missing link.
Answer
Tiktaalik serves as simply another transitional form linking the evolution between two groups of animals, akin to Archaeopteryx. It has become landmark but more work remains to be done. As new fossils are uncovered Tiktaalik will be likely be moved around the evolutionary tree.
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
The concept of the mouth cannot be attributed to a single individual as it is a natural biological feature found in all animals, including humans. The mouth evolved over millions of years through the process of evolution to serve various functions such as eating, speaking, and breathing.
The finches of the Galapagos Islands provided Charles Darwin with the inspiration for his Theory of Evolution. They provided the basis of modern biology. The differences found between species in such a small place are important for the study of Bioogy.
Yes, homologous structures have common bone and muscle structures suggesting that they came from an common ancestor while analogous structures do not share any similarity in features, suggesting that they derived from two separate origins.
Monkey flowers near mines exhibit variations in traits, such as flower color and chemical composition, that allow them to thrive in contaminated soils. Those with adaptations that reduce toxic metal uptake or enhance survival in harsh conditions are more likely to reproduce and pass on their advantageous traits to the next generation. This process of natural selection leads to an evolutionary change in the population over time, demonstrating how environmental pressures can shape species. Thus, the observed adaptations in monkey flowers serve as a clear example of evolution driven by natural selection.
It serves as a bit of evidence. There are millions of other bits of evidence. Without it, evolution would not be damaged, as there are so many other transitional fossils. With it, the theory is a few millionths stronger than it was.
Vestigial organs are remnants of structures that were functional in our ancestors but no longer serve a purpose in modern organisms. The presence of these non-functional structures suggests that they have evolved from ancestral forms where they had a function. This supports the theory of evolution by providing evidence of how species have changed over time through natural selection and adaptation to new environments.
Convergent evolution is the process by which unrelated organisms evolve similar traits or structures in response to similar selection pressures in their environment. This results in analogous structures that serve similar functions despite not being derived from a common ancestor. Examples include the wings of bats and birds for flight, or the streamlined bodies of sharks and dolphins for efficient swimming.
it is a document that serve as evidence of a debenture for a debenture share holder
That's dependent of state laws.
it is a document that serve as evidence of a debenture for a debenture share holder
No, you do not need a lawyer to serve as a witness in your case. Any individual who has relevant information or evidence can serve as a witness, regardless of whether they are a lawyer or not.
Any data that serve as supporting evidence for the main narrative.
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
Convergent evolution is the pattern of evolution where two unrelated species develop similar traits due to similar environmental pressures. This can lead to analogous structures in different species that serve the same function, even though they do not share a common evolutionary origin.
Possibly forensic accounting, where research and interpretation of evidence is important
The layout of the cities along with the similarities in the cultures serve as evidence that the two cultures traded often