Tiktaalik's fin bones were not connected to its main skeleton, and so could not have supported its weight out of water. And the similarity between species could also reflect common design.
Answer
Isn't the modern mudskipper evidence enough?
Answer
No. Recent discovery of the prints of a four-footed animal that dates in evolutionary terms at 18 million years earlier than Tiktaalik have forced scientists to reconsider their earlier assumption that Tiktaalik represented a missing link.
Answer
Tiktaalik serves as simply another transitional form linking the evolution between two groups of animals, akin to Archaeopteryx. It has become landmark but more work remains to be done. As new fossils are uncovered Tiktaalik will be likely be moved around the evolutionary tree.
AnswerTiktaalik Roseae is the name of a recently discovered lobe-finned fossil fish from the late Devonian period, that appears to be a transitional form to amphibians. Its fins were muscular and appeared to be weight-bearing, had bones similar to basic wrists and fingers, as well as the robust ribcage necessitated by existence out of water. Evolutionary scientists believe there would be no natural explanation for Tiktaalik other than evolution.
A good scientific theory should be able to predict facts not yet known. A research team believed, on the basis of the Theory of Evolution, that if they searched the right kind of rocks at the right age, they should find a species that was transitional between fish and land-based amphibians. After five years of escavating in a late-Devonian layer, dated to around 375 million years ago, that they found Tiktaalik Roseae. The discovery was not an accident - the scientists were looking for a species that the Theory of Evolution had predicted would exist and would be there, and they foundit.
While no one would claim that one species irrevocably proves the Theory of Evolution, they believe it presents more evidence that evolution is the most rational explanation we have for the world around us.
For more information on the debate for and against evolution, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
A change from the body form of a common ancestor. Produces homologous structures that may serve different functions. Speaking of evolution. Bones from a human hand are similar but different in numerous species: Chicken, pengun, porpoise, and bat for example. Each used for vastly different jobs but the bones have undergone morphologic divergence.
Cod
to control another animals
The dogo argentino was bred to hunt and kill wild boar, to hunt in a pack, to serve as a good watch dog, and to serve as a good family dog.
It serves as a bit of evidence. There are millions of other bits of evidence. Without it, evolution would not be damaged, as there are so many other transitional fossils. With it, the theory is a few millionths stronger than it was.
Mutation can serve up the raw variation that natural selection selects from, thus alleles are changed over time in populations of organisms; evolution.
That's dependent of state laws.
it is a document that serve as evidence of a debenture for a debenture share holder
it is a document that serve as evidence of a debenture for a debenture share holder
Mutations serve up the variations in organisms to natural selection. The reproductively successful variations pass on these successful traits to progeny and allele frequencies change because of this and this is evolution.
Any data that serve as supporting evidence for the main narrative.
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
Possibly forensic accounting, where research and interpretation of evidence is important
The layout of the cities along with the similarities in the cultures serve as evidence that the two cultures traded often
Euglena Trachelomonas Phacus
Ask them to leave the bar area since drinking alcohol is predominant there.