No. Birds are dinosaurs. We don't ask if frogs evolved from amphibians, because frogs ARE amphibians.
Deinonychus (dai-non-ni-kus) is a transitional form between modern avian dinosaurs and flightless theropods. Deinonychus evolved from utahraptor and it is covered in feathers. It is actually half dinosaur, half bird!!
Answer
There are many feathered dinosaurs such as Sinosauropteryx and Caudipteryx. It is even hypothesized that Tyrannosaurus may have been feather-covered.
Archaeopteryx is the most commonly-cited transitional form between ancient dinosaurs and modern ones (birds). Archaeopteryx had feathers as bird-features but also reptilian/dinosaurian features such as toothed beak, bone-bearing tail and wings with claws.
After the evolutionary production of birds, bills became toothless and thus lighter and tails became boneless and thus lighter and more flexible for flight. Claws remained on the wings of some, such as today's extant Hoatzin, a true bird.
Perhaps we are focusing too much on dinosaur as a whole to bird as a whole as the transition. Feathers have not evolved anywhere else in the animal kingdom, so it appears acceptable to consider the appearance of a semidinosaurian and feathered fossil to represent this dinosaur-bird transitional form. Feathers are the main key. Just feathers!
Birds are highly likely to have evolved from coelurosaurian or carnosaurian dinosaurs.
Answer:Doubtful. Birds do have many features in common with theropods (bipedal carnivorous dinosaurs) which suggests that they had a common ancestor. We dont know that this common ancestor was a dinosaur though. It may well have been a bird (see related links).Looking back in time through the theropod fossil record, these dinosaurs appear to be more bird-like the further back in time you look. Raptors are known to have had feathers and were fairly bird-like, but Archaeopteryx was much more bird-like and lived much earlier and may have been an ancestor of the raptors. There is also a controversial fossil called Protoavis that was dated even earlier and was more bird-like still, with hollow bones like modern birds.
So birds may have been around throughout the mesozoic era and pre-date the dinosaurs. We have little record of them though because their more fragile, hollow bones reduce the chances of any fossils surviving to the present day.
No, but what science is saying that birds might the closest living relatives of the dinosaurs.
They are related in the same way as dogs are to mammals, in other words, birds are dinosaurs. Evidence for this comes from comparison of skeletons and fossils.
Yes! because it is said that birds first originated by dinasoures which could fly.
both
No. Bats are mammals while birds are descended from dinosaurs.
Scientist think that birds are related to dinosaurs because as you study the fossilised bones of certain therapod dinosaurs especially dromaeosaurs you start to notice many similarities between them and modern day birds. The famous archeopteryx for example, which is historically considered the first bird, looked very much like a bird but still had claws on its wings and had a mouth full of teeth. Other dinosaurs from the same time period look even more like birds. In fact experiments done on modern day bird embryos show that if you play around with the genes of birds you can engineer dinosaur features such as teeth, long dinosaur tails etc. All the key features that people associate with birds developed when they were still dinosaurs. Dinosaurs had feathers, dinosaurs had oval shaped eggs, dinosaurs had beaks. The morphology of birds is so similar to some dinosaurs that scientist are starting to consider birds as not just related to dinosaurs but actually as avian dinosaurs.
In a sense, yes. Alligators are related to dinosaurs, or rather, are the only surviving dinosaurs that did not "evolve." Birds are also surviving dinosaurs, but they evolved from the larger, reptilian types of dinos. Alligators, and crocodiles, just got smaller. I know what you are thinking, "How does that answer the question? It asks if alligators are related to dragons, not dinosaurs." In ancient times, people referred to dinosaurs as dragons. Dragons are also mentioned in the Bible to refer to dinosaurs.
There is good evidence that they do. Proteins from the T. rex, the oldest sequences ever reported, were similar to chicken collagen, adding to the mountain of evidence that dinosaurs are most closely related to birds.
In terms of lineage, yes. Birds are descended from dinosaurs, which, along with lizards, belong to a group of reptiles called diapsids. Turtles come from a separate group of reptiles called anapsids.
Dinosaurs are most closely related to birds to the extent that birds are cnsidered a branch of dinosaurs.
No, dinosaurs are more related to reptiles and birds.
No modern bird is more closely related to dinosaurs than any other.
Yes. All birds are direct descendants of dinosaurs and are considered by many to be dinosaurs.
So now you know how dinosaurs are amazingly related to birds!
Birds. The reason is that both crocodiles and dinosaurs are archosaurs, and birds evolved from dinosaurs.
Pterosaurs were closely related to the dinosaurs. Because birds have descended from dinosaurs, the closest living relatives of pterosaurs are birds. All birds are equally related to pterosaurs.
yes, birds are related to them.
They are mostly related to DINOSAURS
The closest living relatives of Stegosaurus are the birds. Birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs, which, being dinosaurs, were somewhat related to Stegosaurus. All birds are equally related to Stegosaurus.
They were small dinosaurs. I'm not kidding.`````````````````No, this person is not kidding. Although, they were not just small dinosaurs. I believe birds are also related to such dinosaurs as Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Of course, if you look at a birds feet it will look scaly