pasture in his famous swan neck experiment proved that life cannot arise spontaneously from non living matter.He prepared meat broth and put it in three separate flasks.He then heated these flask's neck and drawn them in curves TO PREVENT ENTRY OF AIR BORNE MICROBES
A thesis statement is a fact to prove that this is that... your opinion stated as a fact. so as for bigfoot, it would start out as, "Big is real becuase..." or "big foot isn't real becuase...." You need some sort of fact to proove your opinion. though i doubt there is any fact on bigfoot...
The sentence "Bats are useful animals" is a fact because it can be supported with evidence that shows how bats contribute to ecosystems by controlling insect populations and pollinating plants.
fact
Yes, they do.
fact
Lazzaro Spallanzani did not discover the theory of spontaneous generation. In fact, through his experiments in the 18th century, he helped to disprove the theory by showing that living organisms do not arise spontaneously from non-living matter.
Spontaneous generation was the idea that living thoings could develop directly from non-living materials. (See http://www.biology.clc.uc.edu/courses/bio114/spontgen.htm). Experiments carried out by the French scientist Louis Paeteur provided evidence against this idea. (See http://www.kent.k12.wa.us/staff/TimLynch/sci_class/chap01/pasteur.html).
That is the correct spelling of the verb "prove" (establish as fact).
if it's true
The transmission of customs or beliefs from generation to generation, or the fact of being passed on in this way.
The single fact that montag could not prove was that Clarisse has been there but he had no evidence. Montag saw a fire through the trees.
You obviously are confusing spontaneous generation with abiogenesis and have an agenda bias.Ever since the synthesis of urea in the early 19th century we have know that life is a physio-chemical process and there is no divide, except to essentialist, between life and nonlife. In point of fact to ask such a question is ill posed.Comment:There is no agenda in the Bible category as they are not the words of any man. No related question in this category is 'ill posed' - begging to differ with you here.definition (now seemingly archaic): spontaneous generation,the hypothetical process by which living organisms develop from nonliving matter (Britannica Ency)Wikipedia - shortened but you will see the drift: Classical notions of abiogenesis, now more precisely known as spontaneous generation,This Wiki states was prevalent in Western thought in 19th Century - hence the 'Age of Englightenment and Evolution category inclusion - no agenda here, I'm sure of it.
You can prove a fact is true by looking it up on several Internet sites or a book. When looking up a fact make sure that the source you are using is reputable and well versed in the subject you are looking for. It is also a good idea to cross-reference the fact on several sites.
The idea that life forms can spring from inorganic matter is known as spontaneous generation. Aristotle was the chief Western proponent of this belief which was difficult to dislodge because most people had great difficulty in understanding how tiny insects, for instance, could appear as if from nothing.As a matter of fact, Pasteur did not entirely succeed in providing the required proof; however, he did lead the way. By boiling the beef broth in the flask he left the broth unchanged but extinguished the microbial life in it-or at least most of it. Doubters were pushed to the conclusion that there could be no such thing as spontaneous generation, that there must have been something in the broth that boiling had destroyed. The broth did not go bad.Please see the link for a fuller account.
it is used to prove the fact that light is rectilinear in motion
Fact
Yes, it does.