Swallows require air both to breathe and to create lift, therefore it would be impossible for it to fly to the moon. However, it would probably get farther than an English swallow given their respective weight-ratios.
7-9 wing beats per second but for it to carrya coconut from France to England it would have to beat its wings 42 times a second
The average velocity of an unladen swallow would depend on the specific species of swallow, prevailing wind conditions, and flight path taken. Swallows are known to fly at speeds ranging from 20 to 35 miles per hour.
Average weight of elephant = 11,000 pounds Average weight of meerkat = 2 pounds Average meerkat can lift = 4 pounds So if 1 meerkat can lift 4 pounds 2750 meerkats = 1 elephant So it takes 2750 meerkats to lift 1 fully grown elephant happy to be of service to you, robbie
A Lion is an African cat.
Animals such as snakes, frogs, and some birds like pelicans are known to swallow their food whole. They have unique anatomical adaptations that allow them to accommodate large prey in their digestive systems.
It depends on if it is carrying a coconut or not. An unladen swallow can fly at about 10 meters per second. It is 384,400 kilometers to the moon, so it would take the swallow 1 year, 2 months, 18 days, 18 hours, 59 minutes and 46 seconds to get there. A fully laden swallow would take longer.
It was a Monty Python joke. A real swallow could not carry coconuts. However, the airspeed of an unladen swallow is 24 miles per hour.
No. If you do not have a brain, you would not be alive, so you would not be able to swallow.
7-9 wing beats per second but for it to carrya coconut from France to England it would have to beat its wings 42 times a second
An example sentence with 'swallow': I couldn't swallow my cereal as I had a sore throat.
No, they're fully aquatic so they would dry out
At the other end of the swallow.
The average velocity of an unladen swallow would depend on the specific species of swallow, prevailing wind conditions, and flight path taken. Swallows are known to fly at speeds ranging from 20 to 35 miles per hour.
I would say no, because you arent suppose to swallow it and dogs would swallow the listerine...
Considering that bin Laden is dead, my inclination would be to say, "No".
if osama bin laden was not born the twin towers would not have fallen and the u.s. army would not have to waste alot of bullets
An unladen swallow may fly at around 11meters per second, but common sense suggests that if the swallow is carrying extra mass (i.e. is laden, and not too heavily) it will have to work harder just to stay in the air, and will have less capacity to make forward progress through the air. Christoph Schiller, author of the Motion Mountain free physics text book, reproduces a graph (on page 41 in the 21st version) by Henk Tennekes (probably from his book The Simple Science of Flight: From Insects to Jumbo Jets) that appears to show that there is a direct relationship between wing loading and cruising speed for both birds and aircraft, such that higher wing loadings are directly related to higher cruising speed. I queried Schiller on this point and was brushed off. It seems to me that, in the case of any particular model of fixed-wing aircraft, a heavier load (giving a higher wing loading) increases the craft's weight and the wings would have to operate at a higher angle of attack in order to generate more lift for the same airspeed. The higher angle of attack would give rise to more drag which would tend to slow the craft down, assuming that the thrust remained the same. So there you have it. Christoph Schiller (a physicist) seems to quote Henk Tennekes (supposedly an expert in aerodynamics, and part-time climate-change skeptic) as claiming the velocity would be higher in the laden case, whereas common sense and my high-school physics suggests that a heavily laden flyer will make slower forward progress. 12.2 feet per second :) depending on whether it's African or European.