The answer is 1 based on the fact you used the word "a" meaning one. I assume however you refer to the total population of the Broadbill Swordfish which is popular for sport fishing and once feared endangered. The problem is that for most non-mammalian ocean species, direct population measurement is replaced by frequency of encounter (non commercial species) or fishing yields when deciding to declare a species endangered. For most ocean dwelling species it is technically impossible to count and track all individuals in all their territories -- or even approximate that in most cases. Except of course those species tied to the actual surface of the ocean such as airbreathing mammals and a few species that can only survive in the direct sunlight of the top few feet of the ocean surface. For all other species the problem is that the ocean is 3D, not a simple surface like land, which greatly increases the territory in which a species can be found. Further, the ocean is generally a hostile environment to humans in which we can not freely move about and observe. In fact the vast majority of the ocean is open to only handful of humans in submersibles for a few moments of each year. So actually a species merely needs to change its habits to cause a change in its assessed endangerment -- even though in actuallity there is no proof that the number existing has changed. If a species is no longer caught by fishers going to the traditional locations and using the traditional bait and means of catching them...well that fish species is now endangered. If a change in habits makes that species practically jump into a fisherman's net, lines or traps...well suddenly we assume the species has rebounded and is not endangered. However you may find a few expert specialists in a given species willing to make a WAG (Wild Ass Guess) as to "big number" (as in thousands, millions, billions) population based on a whole lot of assumptions. Such assumption might include size of territories and number of fish per volume or the assumptions might be based on spawning rates, availability of prey species, and time to grow versus success rates of commericial fisherman. But likely such experts would different in the details and still ultimately look back to rates at which fishermen harvest or destroy these species. Here is an example of how such WAGs are made & why you cannot put actual numbers on the swordfish population http://www.bigmarinefish.com/swordfish.html
the maximum length of one is 177 in. so the maximum weight of one is 1,400 pounds.
46
Squid, small fish
doas
people, thresher sharks, spinner sharks, basically any shark that is in the same coastal waters as a sword fish written by: Rob
It isn't dangerous at all,On average, a sword-tail is about 2-3 centimetres long, and is completely harmless.Unlike it's usual name-mistakable Sword Fish, that can be up to 7 metres long with it's famous snout, that can be up to 4 metres long.
Swordfish are found in warm and temperate oceans worldwide. While breeding they have been found as far north as Nova Scotia.
Squid, small fish
sword fish :)
ofcause they are they have really sharp razor teeths
blue
The fastest water animal is the dolphin, but the fastest fish is the sail fish, not a sword fish.
The sword fish came into being in the beginning of time in Eden.
The sword fish attacks by lunging its long nose (the "sword" of the fish) at the predator or prey. It basically stabs at the victim to wound it or scare it away.
sword fish live at he bottom of the sea so that humans do not kill them.
sword fish
A sword fish is a fish due to it having gills, and a bone structure, unlike a shark that has cartilage, or a mammal that has lungs.
No, sword fish is not kosher as it does not have the easily removed scales required by the laws of kashrut.
It has been found that there are a number of versions of the game Broken Sword. Some of the Broken Sword games can be played on sites such as Kickstarter, Big Fish Games as well as on the Broken Sword Online websites.