Yes, that statement is true. All scavengers are indeed consumers because they feed on organic matter, but not all consumers are scavengers. Consumers include various organisms that obtain energy by eating other organisms, such as herbivores and predators, while scavengers specifically feed on dead or decaying matter. Thus, scavengers represent a subset of consumers within the broader ecological category.
True
All scavengers eat, it's part of the definition of the word. But not all things that eat are scavengers. Predators aren't scavengers, but they are consumers. Scavengers actually can not exist without primary consumers to scavenge off of.
consumers
If there were no scavengers then all the dead animals would rot .
Yes, all lions are consumers. All animals are consumers.
true
True
true
All scavengers eat, it's part of the definition of the word. But not all things that eat are scavengers. Predators aren't scavengers, but they are consumers. Scavengers actually can not exist without primary consumers to scavenge off of.
consumers
scavengers
primary consumers. they eat producers and get eaten by secondary consumers.
Scavengers are consumers because they obtain their energy by feeding on dead plants or animals. They do not produce their own food through photosynthesis like producers do.
scavengers
No, zebras are primary consumers and herbivores.
consumers
all I know is that there are lots of plants in the savanna and also lots of animals!