No. An animal cannot be both.
No, the basilisk being a lizard is a reptile.
Lizards are reptiles. While some reptiles may be just as happy (if not happier) in the water as out of it (crocodiles, alligators, turtles, snakes), amphibians are biologically adapted to aquatic living (salamanders, frogs, toads). Among the more striking differences between reptiles and amphibians is their skin; reptiles have tough scales where amphibians do not - amphibians tend to produce a mucous layer to keep their skin moist (slimy).
No, a toad is not a reptile. Toads are amphibians, belonging to the order Anura, which includes frogs and toads. Reptiles, on the other hand, are a different class of animals that include snakes, lizards, turtles, and crocodiles.
hermanns tortoise; Hamilton Island frog;
lizard
Amphibian.
A lilly frog or a giant lizard
A salamander is an amphibian that looks like a lizard.
A Gecko is a lizard - which is a reptile.
No, the basilisk being a lizard is a reptile.
An Emu is a flightless bird
Every lizard is a reptile not an amphibian.
No, in no way at all as the lizard is a reptile and a newt is an amphibian, two similar looking classifications but still different.
If it is a lizard it can't be a salamander because a salamander is an amphibian.
A salamander is a creature that is like a lizard, but is actually an amphibian not a reptile.
bird lizard amphibian fish and rarely mammal
Salamander or newt. They look sort of like lizards but are amphibians.