Animals should be used for scientific research because their use can save the lives of humans. This type of testing makes it much easier to create medications that are safe for humans.
No there are not any animals that have not been named. When people find them, they should be named...I think! No there are not any animals that have not been named. When people find them, they should be named...I think!
No, students should not dissect any animals.
Animal testing for scientific medical research is a controversial issue. While it has contributed to many significant medical advancements, there are ethical concerns regarding the treatment of animals. It is important to continue exploring alternative methods and technologies that may reduce the need for animal testing.
Dangerous animals should be protected because it is the circle of life. Without these dangerous animals there would be more a higher population of other species eventually overpopulating the earth. For example, if all lions were killed, gazelles would eventually overpopulate. The same goes for other animals and their prey and predators.
if the sheds of animals are not kept clean then the animals dung, urine and decaying fodder should be dumped in a composed pit
There is no scientific explanation for this. - Evan Apolonio
Scientific explanations are testable if confidence in the explanation could be undermined by a failure to observe the predicted outcome. One should be able to imagine outcomes that would disprove the explanation.
I believe that people should stop using animals for scientific use
If you do not harm the animals than yes you should.
Animals should always have rights when it comes to scientific and technological advances. Specifically, any advancement that is harmful to animals should probably not be implemented, unless the benefits far outweigh the problems.
Using animals in scientific research is not humane. However, there are times when it becomes necessary for medical tests. Testing for the sake of cosmetics and similar trivial causes should be banned entirely.
You should care because of all the scientific research we can get from the animals. You should care because we are the ones guilty for bringing these poor, defence less animals to their doom.
A published hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that has undergone a formal review process and has been documented in a scientific journal or publication. It outlines the researcher's expectation about the relationship between variables or the outcome of an experiment.
A figure legend in a scientific paper should include a brief title describing the figure, a clear explanation of what the figure shows or represents, any relevant details about the data or methods used to create the figure, and any abbreviations or symbols used in the figure.
B. Both orientations are using scientific methods of study.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Explanation should include the marketing functions and their application to business operations.