This is a controversial question and many people have different opinions regarding whether people should debark a dog. Ideas from both sides will be discussed.
Many people and animal welfare organisations strongly believed that debarking dogs is a cruel process. Not only does it cause great pain, but it also removes a dog's natural ability to communicate with sounds. Dogs should be granted with the freedom to communicate verbally, just as humans have the freedom of speech. Also, some people think that owners should not get a dog in the first place or live in a neighbourhood that allows dogs if they dislike barking so much. In addition, most dogs can be stopped from barking through behaviour training and negative reinforcements (excluding physical violence). If the problem is really serious and training has no effect, then medication given by a reputable veterinarian can definitely help with the problem.
On the other hand, some people think that continuous barking extremely annoying and find training ineffective. To them, it may the only option left before abandoning, giving away or euthanizing their dog, which is definitely unfair. They may also think that owners should have the right to debark the dog. The dog belongs to them, hence they should be allowed to make choices like this. Moreover, debarking is not banned in most countries, so there are no legal consequences for conducting this surgery.
In conclusion, it is only a matter of opinion whether people should debark a dog, as there are both pros and cons that support this idea. However, it is strongly recommended that you find alternative solutions for stopping continuous barking before considering debarking (eg. behaviour training) as debarking is a painful and often unnecessary process that removes a dog's natural ability to communicate verbally.
because resources
A "bark collar". Two barks allowed.
Just search it on google their are previous searches done on wiki answers which I looked at What_is_the_only_breed_of_dog_legally_allowed_in_churchI aggree with this answer because a lot of blind people may be christian so eye dogs should be allowed or other disabilty dogs.If you have like a tea cup chihuahua I suggest you don't take it to church or any other dogs like that.Hope this helps
People should know about kelp because it can get stuck in their boat propellers or it in their fishing rods.
The simple answer is - it's not possible to regulate who would be able to see nude people on TV. There are ratings for films that show nudity - to prevent children viewing material they are too young to understand. With TV certain nudity is allowed - but only after a set time in the evening (when children should be in bed !)
"allowed" implies there should be sanctions- inappropriate
All law-abiding people should be allowed in Australia, gay or straight.
The real answer is that gay people should be allowed to do anything in public that straight people are allowed. If straight people kiss in public, gay people should also.
There is no reason why gay males and lesbians should not be allowed.
yes they be allowed
intoxicated
of course not, it should be banned.
Yes. Anyone who can provide a good home to a child should be allowed to adopt. Gay people and single people have proven to be exemplary parents.
no
yes people are allowed to swim In the great barrier reef
Your question calls for an opinion. My opinion is that people SHOULD be allowed to own a gun.
i think that they should because it is human right however if people are misbehaving then they should not