Like most people would say "Two minds are better than one" The advantage is having one person means no arguments leading to hair pulling out and break-ups. The disadvantage is that people can rush to conclusions and not entirely think about what they are getting into until its too late.
Individual decisions work for the best of interest of the person with no compromise. A group decision will require sacrifice on the part of one or more people.
A bilateral decision is taken by the two sides or two parties involved in the decision-making process.
Yes, insects have several advantages to outweigh the disadvantages for being small. Their population is 10 times more bigger than larger animals, producers (plants) are huge compared to the consumers (insects), so their food source is better, and their harder to detect in seize if the predator is massive in comparison.
Wrong category. This is for animal related questions.
Two ways to interpret and answer this:1) The role of majority rule is defined by the common interpretation of how and if it IS being used in certain ways.2) The role can be defined in many ways.Taken from wikipedia:Proponents of consensus decision-making view procedures that use majority rule as undesirable for several reasons. Majority voting is regarded as competitive, rather than cooperative, framing decision-making in a win/lose dichotomy that ignores the possibility of compromise or other mutually beneficial solutions.[3]On the other hand, some voting theorists[who?] have argued that majority rule leads to better deliberation practice than the alternatives, because it requires each member of the group to make arguments that appeal to at least half the participants and it encourages coalition-building.[4] Additionally, proponents of consensus argue that majority rule can lead to a 'tyranny of the majority'. However, voting theorists note that majority rule may actually prevent tyranny of the majority, in part because it maximizes the potential for a minority to form a coalition that can overturn an unsatisfactory decision.[5]Advocates of consensus would assert that a majority decision reduces the commitment of each individual decision-maker to the decision. Members of a minority position may feel less commitment to a majority decision, and even majority voters who may have taken their positions along party or bloc lines may have a sense of reduced responsibility for the ultimate decision. The result of this reduced commitment, according to many consensus proponents, is potentially less willingness to defend or act upon the decision.
Considering they're each full grown at there prime, I'd bet on the Amur 8/10 times. Again, it could go either way, but it's shear size and weight over powers the Barbary. Manes can be an advantage, but also a disadvantage. Tigers often don't go for a choke hold when fighting, that's only for hunting. Making the lion's mane a handicap. Thus, making the tiger stronger by agility and power. Also, the largest of the Siberians could kill a Barbary with EASE. I'm just assuming they're on average prime size, around 500 lbs for the lion and 600-650 for the tiger.
disadvantage making predictions
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
slowness of the decision-making process
ME
it used fioe making drills
One advantage of quantitative techniques in planning is the ability to have better information. A disadvantage is the fact that the process takes too long.
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
its stipid qestion jo dik khato
You share decision making and profits in a partnership.
Identify the decision you need to make
there are many advantages probably making life easeir
There are a few advantages and disadvantages of making a checklist. One advantage of a checklist is that it is harder to forget stuff.