No
You can see tigers in the US if you go to a zoo and there are a few people with licenses to keep tigers and other big cats as pets but they are not native animals to the US they are more typically found in Southwest Asia, China, Korea, and Russia.
because we have all heard that tigers are dangerous and we think they will kill us
They can be, as all three animals are confirmed maneaters.
Both phrases are grammatically correct. "A herd of tigers" is commonly used for tigers, but "a group of tigers" is also acceptable. Both phrases are used to describe a collection of tigers.
Tigers? Yes. Wild Tigers? No. Tigers in the US are only in refuges and zoos. So don't go oout and go tiger scouting in Colorodo.
Us humans are a threat to Bengal tigers
There are no tigers native to the US.
No. An animal can only be endangered in its natural habitat. And Siberian TIgers aren't native to the US:
No
You can see tigers in the US if you go to a zoo and there are a few people with licenses to keep tigers and other big cats as pets but they are not native animals to the US they are more typically found in Southwest Asia, China, Korea, and Russia.
umm... NONE! unless you're talking about tigers in zoos...
There are no tigers native to the Americas. You will only find tigers in captivity.
because we have all heard that tigers are dangerous and we think they will kill us
In zoos.
tigers
No, tigers are not native to the US at all. They are native in Asia. A completely different continent.