The basics of the idea are as follows: You isolate a complete intact cell from a donor, taken from a part of the body where the cells of which are known to contain COMPLETE DNA molecules, not partials or probable mutations. The lining of your abdomen is one such bodypart as its one of the first parts of your physiology to develope in the embryo. That means the cells in the lining of your abdomen have complete copies of your parental DNA, not copies of copies, or copies of copies of copies, etc... You need the COMPLETE, more original DNA molecule to make a complete clone.
Once you have isolated a cell within which is known to be a complete copy of the Parental DNA molecule of the organism you want to clone, then insert that intact/healthy cell inside of an egg-cell that has had the mother's reproductive chromosomes removed/pulled out. This leaves you with an empty egg, which now only needs a complete DNA molecule to act where in nature the parents' donated/combined chromosomes would otherwise have functioned. Having inserted the egg with the cell holding the complete DNA-molecule, a small controlled electric shock fuses the donor cell from the animal to be cloned, to the egg. Another closes the egg, and kick-starts the cell-metabolism up again, pushing it into mitosis, where the cell divides over and over, and the resulting continued cell-growth becomes and turns into the embryo of the clone you just made.
If the embryo is quickly introduced into a surrogate mother so it may carry the cloned lifeform's growth into a fetus, and then to term (assuming the gestation is successful and the clone is not rejected), then the cloning process is said to have gone 'full-term'. This means that it produced a living/breathing stable clone of the original animal you were trying to copy.
As you can imagine, this process takes years and years of study, no small amount of patience, hefty funding, and some VERY unique and specific equipment. This I'm guessing will probably cost through the roof (like a micro-manipulator array, for example). This is why cloning is only undertaken by large stable companies like pharmacuetical companies or high-end educational or research establishments, like universities.
An advantage of cloning is that they can produce the right milk and produce good quality meat. A disadvantage of cloning is that it reduces variety in a population (this means the population are less able to survive any changes to their environment).
As far as is known no human cloning has taken place. Yet.
Pros: Cloning can help preserve endangered species, enhance agricultural productivity, and advance medical research through the creation of genetically modified animals for drug testing. Cons: Cloning raises ethical concerns regarding animal welfare, may lead to reduced genetic diversity, and can result in health issues and abnormalities in cloned animals.
when saying symptoms meaning stuff clonage might do then clonage can actually might help cancer and other types of diseases by getting the healthy part of organism and cloning it to cure and clean
Cloning can have mixed effects on cows. While it can help in propagating valuable genes and traits, it may also be associated with health issues and abnormalities in the cloned cows. Additionally, the process of cloning can be stressful for the animals involved.
Yes it is becoming a major issue of scientists who are cloning animals and also killing them and also torturing animals and also hitting and animals and these animals are called afzalanians
yes
The basic procedural steps involved in cloning humans and animals are similar, but there are key ethical and legal considerations that make human cloning a more complex process. In animals, cloning is usually done for agricultural or research purposes, while human cloning raises serious ethical concerns related to individual rights and dignity. Additionally, there are legal restrictions in many countries that prohibit human cloning.
Its about your opinion. The animals haven't been hurt..
yes by cloning
Yes, they have cloned animals.
The disscussions of cloning are still very vague. It is well known that the cloning of human beings is illegal, due to religious problems. On the other hand the cloning of plants and animals is legal.
No. Cloning animals is not illegal.
On animals and plants
Cloning of animals is legal, but cloning of humans is considered to be a taboo and is not legal.
Cloning of genes involves making copies of specific DNA sequences, while cloning of animals involves creating a genetic replica of an entire organism. Gene cloning is done in a laboratory setting and focuses on manipulating DNA, whereas animal cloning requires transferring a nucleus into an egg cell to create a living organism with the same genetic material.
YES! Cloning of animals is a sientific man made process. In my opinion they should not mess with nature and let animals reproduce themselves. ANS2: No! There are a number of animals that reproduce by cloning. Almost all bacteria, most Protists and even animals as complex as Coelenterates reproduce by cloning...naturally. ANS3: Animal cloning is unnatural if you're talking about the manmade kind, and I agree with the ANS1, why are we wasting time , effort and $$$ on cloning things that aren't event endangered? We should probably be spending that money on other things If we really don't want certain species to go extinct