It should be:
Neither the mouse nor the rats could find their way through the maze.
ANS2:I will venture to postulate that the "its" could refer to an antecedent that had been presented in a preceding sentence:(The cheese was wrapped hermetically in plastic and dragged through the maze.) Neither the mouse nor the rats could find its way through the maze.
In this case, the rodents were unable to find the way of the cheese (its way) so, the sentence makes perfect grammatical sense.
Also, the rodents may have not all followed the same path...such being the nature of trial-and-error solutions. In that case, each rodent would have to find its own way and force you to make "way" plural.
Neither the mouse nor the rats could find their ways through the maze.
The mouse was scurrying across the floor
The stalking kitten pounced on the mouse.
The tiger was not afraid to pounce on the small mouse.
This depends on where you live. It could be a wood mouse, field mouse, house mouse, mole, vole, packrat or something else. You would have to see it to identify it.
The mouse scurried to the chunk of cheese and ate it all up.
The mouse tried to go through the maze to find its chesse.
The mouse's tail was very long.
The mouse went that way.
Neither would or could be passed on genetically.
Neither. Arthur is an aardvark
They could see where the mouse had been gnawing on the piece of wood by the marks that were on it.
The nouns are cat & mouse.
Active.'I' is the subject of the sentence. Passive sentences don't have subjects. egactive - The cat chased the mouse. subject = catpassive - The mouse was chased.Passive verb phrases are - be + past participle- there is no be verb in your sentence.
Yes...I am pretty sure that you can. Example: The cat advances(ed) on the mouse stealthily.
Yes, If you can fit a pen or pencil under your door a MOUSE could fit through. Please be aware of this danger. NOOOOO
The Mouse Was RELUCTANT To Be Caught In The Mouse Trap.
some are I dont like mouse because there dirty