there are many ethical problems involved in cloning humans
Fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals are all vertebrates. They all have a backbone and internal bones.
Platypuses are mammals. They are warm-blooded, unlike reptiles, and they have fur, unlike reptiles which have scaly skin. Platypuses are monotremes, meaning they are egg-laying mammals.
Scientists classify fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals together in the group called "vertebrates" because they all share a backbone or spinal column. This classification is based on common anatomical features and evolutionary history, indicating that these diverse animal groups share a common ancestor. By grouping them together, scientists can study their similarities and differences more effectively, enhancing our understanding of their biology and evolution.
humans, animals, mammals is all the same. we evolved from apes. i hate that fact...stupid scientists why didnt they just keep that fact to themselves u freaken animals
Scientists called chiropterologists study bats. They research various aspects of bat biology, behavior, ecology, and conservation in order to better understand and protect these unique mammals.
The difference between cloning genes and cloning a mammal is that when a gene is cloned, it is typically removed from a DNA sequence and inserted into an organism. The cloning of a mammal, however, is when a somatic cells from the mammal are cloned to produce a "copy" of the mammal.
It hasn't been achieved so far, but since other mammals have been cloned, it doesn't seem impossible. There are currently more ethical and legal problems, than technical problems (cloning is already illegal in some countries).
Sheep
Read "Jurrassic Park" by Michale Crichton. There's your answer
Despite being mammals, platypuses lay eggs. They are monotremes, that is, egg-laying mammals.
No. Despite sharing some characteristics mammals and birds are not closely related.
Echidnas are mammals, despite being egg-laying mammals, or monotremes. Therefore, like all mammals, they feed their young on mothers' milk.
As of now, human cloning remains largely theoretical and is not legally or ethically practiced. While advancements in reproductive and therapeutic cloning technologies have been made in animals, such as the cloning of sheep and other mammals, significant scientific, ethical, and regulatory hurdles prevent human cloning. The technology required for safe and effective human cloning is not yet available, and many countries have laws that prohibit such practices. Research continues in related fields, but the focus is primarily on stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine rather than cloning humans.
Scientists can tell Megatheriums were mammals by examining their skeletal features, which show characteristics common to mammals such as specialized teeth, a jaw structure adapted for chewing, and a reproductive system unique to mammals. Additionally, the presence of hair or fur impressions in some preserved specimens further supports the idea that Megatheriums were mammals.
The success rate of cloning can vary depending on the species, but generally it is relatively low. For example, in mammals, the success rate of cloning using somatic cell nuclear transfer is usually less than 5%. This is due to challenges such as developmental abnormalities, low pregnancy rates, and early postnatal mortality.
Subcutaneous fat. Hair (mammals) Feathers (birds)
Echidnas are classed as mammals. Specifically, they are monotremes, or egg-laying mammals. They are classified as mammals despite being egg-layers, because the young suckle mothers' milk. This is the defining characteristic of all mammals. Like most other mammals, they also have fur.