It is true that certain anatomical structures change in size according to use, but these changes cannot be passed on to the organism's offspring.
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
rejected.
Lamarck's Hypothesis of Evolution(Small note before answer: Lamarck had a hypothesis, not a theory) Lamarck, as well as other naturalists, hypothesized evolution via environmental change before Darwin. However, many failed to account for changes in the fossil record and interactions of the phenotypes of animals on their environment. Despite Lamarck's advances in the field, he is most remembered in history for the incorrect mechanisms of this evolution that he posited.Lamarck's hypothesis of evolution appeared in his Zoological Philosophical Work written in 1809, featuring two mechanisms of evolutionary change: use and disuse and inheritance of acquired characteristics.His evolutionary hypothesis was as follows:Environmental changes generate new needsThese needs determine the use or disuse of some organsSuch organs develop or are diminishedThe acquired characters are hereditary
Lamarck's hypothesis about evolution was that animals would change based on their environment during their lifetime and pass on those traits to their offspring. This is different from Darwin's theory in that all animals mutate in someway and it's the surviving mutations that pass on that slowly change the animal over many generations.
Lamarck's theory of evolution, known as Lamarckism, proposed that organisms could pass on traits acquired during their lifetime to their offspring, a concept known as "inheritance of acquired characteristics." This idea was incorrect because it suggested that changes acquired through use or disuse, such as a giraffe stretching its neck to reach higher leaves, could be inherited, which contradicts modern genetic understanding. Evolution is now understood to occur through genetic mutations and natural selection, where traits are passed down based on genetic inheritance rather than acquired characteristics.
to see if your hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
say that your hypothesis is incorrect in your conclusion
If your hypothesis is totally incorrect then it is quite likely that the data will not support it.
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
Reject the hypothesis.
just admit you were wrong, and start over, because a hypothesis is what you think might happen
False. When a hypothesis is shown to be incorrect, it does not necessarily mean the experiment is a failure. It provides valuable information and contributes to the scientific process by ruling out one possible explanation, allowing for further refinement of the hypothesis.
His evidence was incorrect.
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
Example: Hypothesis: I Think The Flower Will Sink Into The Water Conclusion: When I Tested My Experiment , I Found That My Hypothesis Was Incorrect And The Flower Floated On Top Of The Water
i think it's conclusionThis is a homework question we can't answer for you.
It is false.