The little Albert experiment was significant for a number of reasons. It showed that fears could be taught over time. It showed that actions or thoughts could be forced in or forced out. It clearly contradicted the idea that Biology is everything, and gave solid evidence for the importance of nurture. It also raised ethical questions over what is acceptable experimental procedure, and what isn't.
There is no definitive response that can be given because there were two variables in the experiment that could lead to different conclusions.
John B. Watson, after observing children in the field, was interested in finding support for his notion that the reaction of children, whenever they heard loud noises, was prompted by fear. Furthermore, he reasoned that this fear was innate or due to an unconditioned response
Albert Einstein's favourite animal is a Blue Heron.
what is the significance of having a bird nest on the front door
D) Number 2 because the experiment was repeated and the results were always the same
John B. Watson conducted the Little Albert experiment in 1920.
Watson and Rayner's experiment with little Albert had a number of ethical issues. The most important is harm to the participant. Albert was subjected to loud clanging noises and was made to develop a phobia. He also did not give informed consent as he was only a very small child. For these reasons, the experiment would not be performed today.
The Little Albert experiment showed that classical conditioning could be used to create a fear response in a child by pairing a neutral stimulus (a white rat) with a loud noise. This experiment demonstrated that fear responses could be learned through conditioning and generalized to other similar stimuli.
his significance were that he had discovered alot and made experimence
he was in history
In John Watson's behavioral experiment, known as the Little Albert experiment, a young child named Albert was conditioned to fear a white rat by pairing its presence with a loud, jarring noise. Albert eventually generalized this fear to other white objects, demonstrating how conditioning can induce fear responses in humans. The long-term effects on Albert's emotional well-being and development are unknown, as the study lacked proper ethical considerations and follow-up assessments.
The Little Albert experiment demonstrated how fear could be conditioned in a child through the association of a neutral stimulus (a white rat) with a loud, startling noise. This illustrated the concept of classical conditioning, where a new response (fear) is learned and triggered by a previously neutral stimulus (the rat).
There is no definitive response that can be given because there were two variables in the experiment that could lead to different conclusions.
There were many ethical problems with the Little Albert study. Firstly, it was clearly a case of harm to the participant. Albert was consistently made to experience a loud clanging, and ultimately it drove him to feel extreme fear. Secondly, there was not informed consent as Albert was still very young. Thirdly, the right to withdraw was under question as, even as Albert became distressed with the experiment, it continued.
a variable can throw the whole experiment off and will have to be repeated.
Information is scant, but it appears that their experiment was imperfectly designed and not well reported. Little Albert, a pseudonym assigned for the experiment, was the subject of the experiment. He was later removed from the experiment before testing could be competently completed, so, too little data could be gathered. Additionally, and by today's standards, there appear to have been ethical problems associated with the experiment as well. The real Little Albert was reportedly identified after his death in 1925, but there seems to be no confirmation of the authenticity of this claim. The entire episode is clouded by a scandal due to an alleged affair with his partner in this experiment, Rosalie Rayner. Divorce ensued and Watson was subsequently dismissed from his position at Johns Hopkins University and found employment in private sector advertising. Much unreliable information has grown since then, regarding this experiment and it is regarded today as interesting, but of little value of itself.
E=mc2