Without the fur trade, many Indigenous communities would have retained more traditional ways of life and economic practices, potentially leading to stronger cultural preservation. The absence of this trade could also have resulted in less European colonization and exploitation in certain regions, altering historical power dynamics. Additionally, ecosystems might have experienced different patterns of wildlife populations and habitats, as fur-bearing animals would not have faced the same levels of hunting pressure. However, the impact on global economies and the development of certain industries would have been significant, leading to alternate economic pathways.
The fur trade did not end in the 1700s. It flourished well into the 1800s. In fact, there is some semblance of a fur trade still today.
Various animals were hunted for their fur during the fur trade, including beavers, otters, martens, minks, foxes, and sables. These animals were sought after for their luxurious fur coats and were heavily traded and exploited during the fur trade era.
beaver
cause they were funny
Yes, fur trading still exists today, but it is much less common than in the past due to increased regulations and ethical concerns surrounding animal welfare. Some indigenous communities still practice fur trading as part of their cultural traditions, and fur products can also be found in some high-end fashion markets.
they would have natives trade fur for things like guns and beer
gun's ammo and other things that are usfull
their fur is but they are not without the fur. It would be only skin.
a fur trade monopoly is the control over fur
they would get in trouble and get hurt
what animal were used for the fur trade?
The ojibve peoples were involved in the fur trade.
The fur trade is the voyagers Carrie and ship fur to other places.
The French fur traders had to trade for bear fur, deer skin. They had to trade theese things because they were warm
The fur trade began long ago when fur was prized for its use in clothing. Fur did things that no other material would do. It had a practical application that made it valuable. This evolved into trading fur because of the beauty of pelts or skins, and they were used for adornments or fashion.
they helped the fur trade by translating
No. There was no fur trade at that time.