0
Lamarck and Darwin both agreed that species evolve over time and that this process leads to the adaptation of organisms to their environments. They recognized the importance of environmental factors in shaping traits and behaviors. However, while Lamarck proposed the inheritance of acquired characteristics as the mechanism for evolution, Darwin introduced natural selection as the primary driving force, marking a fundamental difference in their theories.
What else can I help you with?
In what ways did Lamarck and Darwin agree?
Lamarck and Darwin both agreed on the idea that organisms change over time and that these changes can lead to the evolution of new species. They recognized the influence of the environment on the traits of organisms, suggesting that adaptations can arise in response to environmental pressures. Additionally, both scientists acknowledged the importance of variation within species, although they differed significantly in their explanations of how these changes occur.
Do you agree or disagree with Lamarck's theory of need?
I disagree with Lamarck's theory of need, which posits that organisms develop traits based on their needs during their lifetime and pass those traits to their offspring. Modern genetics and evolutionary biology support the idea that traits are inherited through genetic variation and natural selection, rather than acquired characteristics. While environmental pressures can influence evolution, they do not directly cause changes in an organism that are then inherited by future generations. Lamarck's ideas have been largely supplanted by Darwinian evolution and the understanding of genetic inheritance.
How did Aristotle contribute to the theory of evolution?
Actually Aristotle wasn't known to contribute to the evolution theory as he didn't agree with most of the theories that were brought up by other philosophers. The only contribution he might have taken apart of was causing conflict between other philosophers and other theory discoveries.
How do you know that evolution has been going on for millions of years?
The question of 'how do you know evolution does not exist?' does not have a rational answer. Evolution can be proven through science today. Any religion denying evolution is based on what people believe, rather than what science says. Look at fossil records. Those records which are more than a billion years old show evolution. Even our DNA. Humans' DNA is 96% the same as chimpanzees. If we didn't evolve from a common ancestor, why are we almost exactly the same? Evolution explains why we are here today and how we got here, based on the facts.
what is the best item for pet?
Food, water, air, and love
What do you think if i say that for me there are no differences between Darwin and Lamarck?
i would agree with you. i belive they both had the same theory.
Do you agree Darwin's theory of evolution?
Yes, as a scientific concept, Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection has been supported by a vast amount of evidence since its proposal. It serves as the foundation for modern evolutionary biology.
Do you agree with Darwin's theory in today's world?
No
In what ways did Lamarck and Darwin agree?
Lamarck and Darwin both agreed on the idea that organisms change over time and that these changes can lead to the evolution of new species. They recognized the influence of the environment on the traits of organisms, suggesting that adaptations can arise in response to environmental pressures. Additionally, both scientists acknowledged the importance of variation within species, although they differed significantly in their explanations of how these changes occur.
Do you Agree on the theory of evolution?
Ya!
Do modern day people still agree with Charles Darwin's theory of evolution?
Yes, the majority of scientists and educated individuals accept Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. It is supported by a wealth of scientific evidence from various fields, such as genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. However, some religious groups and individuals may still reject the theory based on their beliefs.
Darwin proposes that all species of the natural world are in a constant state of evolution whereby natural selection plays a pivotal role in the survival of species Do you agree with this theory of yo?
It is not a matter of agreement, it is a matter of accepting the overwhelming evidences in support of the theory of evolution by natural selection.
Do you agree or disagree with Lamarck's theory of need?
I disagree with Lamarck's theory of need, which posits that organisms develop traits based on their needs during their lifetime and pass those traits to their offspring. Modern genetics and evolutionary biology support the idea that traits are inherited through genetic variation and natural selection, rather than acquired characteristics. While environmental pressures can influence evolution, they do not directly cause changes in an organism that are then inherited by future generations. Lamarck's ideas have been largely supplanted by Darwinian evolution and the understanding of genetic inheritance.
Did everyone agree with Charles Darwin's theory at first?
No, not everyone agreed with Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection when it was first proposed in the 19th century. It was a controversial idea that challenged existing religious and scientific beliefs about the origins of life. It took some time for his ideas to gain widespread acceptance in the scientific community.
Why are creationists upset with Darwin's theory?
His theory doesn't fit with their ideas. They usually use the Bible to answer questions that science already has or is working on. These are questions that are not scientific questions but ones that are best debated and answered by philosophy.
If Charles Darwin were to sit down to debate Jean-Baptiste Lamarck what would they agree on?
C. It's likely that organisms, including bacteria, are always changing 8/22/08
Why was Darwins theory not accepted?
Darwin's theory was accepted,at first Darwin himself did not publish his findings as he did not feel anybody else would agree with his findings but once he found that a fellow scientist had conducted the same research and was going to publish his findings Darwin then also decided that he would publish his findings also.
