Snakes and crocodiles because snakes and crocodiles are both reptiles but a frog is an amphibian.
Decrease, as snakes are predators of frogs and an increase in snake population would lead to more predation on frogs, reducing their population.
Yes, but not very closely. Specifically, crocodiles and Liopleurodon are diapsid reptiles, but that is a very large grouping of animals indeed. To illustrate, crocodiles are more closely related to chickens than they are to Liopleurodon, on account of chickens being archosaurs, just as crocodiles are. Liopleurodon belongs to the pliosaurs, a group of extinct marine reptiles with relatively short necks. They are thought to be more closely related to lizards and snakes than to crocodiles. The external similarities between Liopleurodon and crocodiles (that long snout with a multitude of sharp teeth, for example) are due to convergent evolution, not a close evolutionary relationship. However, there did exist "marine crocodiles" that lived at about the same time as pliosaurs like Liopleurodon that were much more closely related to modern crocodiles, i.e. Thalattosuchians.
There are a variety of frogs that eat snakes. Large bullfrogs have been known to eat snakes at times, as have many of their larger cousins in Africa and South America. More specifically, these are the Argentine Horned Frog and the Goliath frogs.
Snakes have fewer eggs because they tend to invest more energy in producing larger and more developed offspring compared to frogs. This strategy increases the chances of survival for their offspring. Frogs, on the other hand, produce many eggs with less investment in each, increasing the odds of at least some surviving to adulthood.
In the wild, crocodiles eat food that is convenient. Crocodiles can eat frogs, fish, and even baby crocodiles. These animals are prey driven and will eat smaller ones that live within the same ecosystem.
Crocodiles are distantly related to lizards and snakes and even more distantly related to turtles. Strangely, the closest relatives to crocodiles and alligators are actually birds. This is because both crocodiles and dinosaurs belong to a group called archosaurs. Birds, in turn, evolved from dinosaurs.
frogs
No. Tuataras are more closely related to lizards and snakes than to dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are more closely related to crocodiles and even more closely related to birds, which are their only living descendants.
Decrease, as snakes are predators of frogs and an increase in snake population would lead to more predation on frogs, reducing their population.
there would be no snakes to eat the frogs and with more frogs their would be less grasshoppers
Yes, but not very closely. Specifically, crocodiles and Liopleurodon are diapsid reptiles, but that is a very large grouping of animals indeed. To illustrate, crocodiles are more closely related to chickens than they are to Liopleurodon, on account of chickens being archosaurs, just as crocodiles are. Liopleurodon belongs to the pliosaurs, a group of extinct marine reptiles with relatively short necks. They are thought to be more closely related to lizards and snakes than to crocodiles. The external similarities between Liopleurodon and crocodiles (that long snout with a multitude of sharp teeth, for example) are due to convergent evolution, not a close evolutionary relationship. However, there did exist "marine crocodiles" that lived at about the same time as pliosaurs like Liopleurodon that were much more closely related to modern crocodiles, i.e. Thalattosuchians.
There are a variety of frogs that eat snakes. Large bullfrogs have been known to eat snakes at times, as have many of their larger cousins in Africa and South America. More specifically, these are the Argentine Horned Frog and the Goliath frogs.
I don't think it's possible. But there is a frog species that looks like a turtle, it's a Turtle Frog. If it is possible for a turtle to be with a frog, then what in the world are they doing?!?! That is just weird. Your curious question is still not answered!
Snakes have fewer eggs because they tend to invest more energy in producing larger and more developed offspring compared to frogs. This strategy increases the chances of survival for their offspring. Frogs, on the other hand, produce many eggs with less investment in each, increasing the odds of at least some surviving to adulthood.
In the wild, crocodiles eat food that is convenient. Crocodiles can eat frogs, fish, and even baby crocodiles. These animals are prey driven and will eat smaller ones that live within the same ecosystem.
They are more closely related to foxes. Both foxes are snakes are vertebrates. Starfish are echinoderms.
Yes.animals like frogs,snakes and more are able to adabt to the Amazon rainforest