because once the animals die out, other animals that depend on them for food or symbiosis will die out and the animals that depend on THEM die out etc. also the food source of the extinct animal will flourish and overpopulate, causing the food source for it to die out. It is overall a long and complicated proccess
Extinction is the rule, not the exception. That being said, I would not like to be responsible for the extinction of an animal.
Absolutely ! The human race is the only animal species on the planet that has hunted other species to extinction.
the answer to the question is extinction
The Permian-Triassic extinction event, around 252 million years ago, marked the end of the Permian period and the beginning of the Triassic period. It is the most severe extinction event in Earth's history, wiping out approximately 95% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species. The Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, about 66 million years ago, ended the Cretaceous period and led to the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs and about 75% of all plant and animal species.
I dont know why anyone would ask this question. it means that the animal is on the verge of extinction, dummy. :) jk! no hard feelings, homester! ;)
what are the disvantages of animal extinction
Extinction is the rule, not the exception. That being said, I would not like to be responsible for the extinction of an animal.
take care of them
we can stop cutting down animal habitats
animal activist comes to mind
The animal that the railroads nearly drove to extinction was the Buffalo. The railroads severely destroyed the buffalo's natural habitat.
No longer in existence
Biology.
I could answer it if it made sense
Extinction
None
Koalas are neither extinct nor in any immediate danger of extinction. At this stage, therefore, it is not an environmental problem.