0
What else can I help you with?
On the basis of similar body structures scientists hypothesize the two species are closely related what other evidence would the scientist look forward to support their hypothesis?
To support their hypothesis of close relatedness between the two species, scientists would examine genetic evidence, such as DNA sequences, to identify similarities and differences in their genomes. They might also analyze protein structures and biochemical pathways, as well as fossil records that indicate shared evolutionary history. Additionally, behavioral and ecological similarities could provide further support for their relationship.
What is the most conclusive evidence used in establishing the relationship of closely related species?
DNA sequencing is often the most conclusive evidence used to establish the relationship of closely related species. By comparing the genetic sequences of different species, scientists can determine the degree of similarity and divergence, providing insights into their evolutionary relationships. Additionally, the presence of shared anatomical features or similarities in embryonic development can also support the relationship between closely related species.
What have scientists learned about the elephant shrew on DNA evidence?
Most elephant shrew species were first described in the 1800s by scientists who classified them as shrews because of obvious physical similarities.
Do scientists have proof that mermaids exist?
No, scientists have not found any evidence or proof that mermaids exist. The concept of mermaids is largely based on folklore and mythology, rather than scientific observation or documentation.
Why are vestigial proof of evolution?
Evidence, not proof. Scientists do not prove things. Your coccyx for one bit of evidence, This is the " stump " of a vestigial tail that is now used for another purpose in humans; to help with sitting. Sometimes this tail does grow out in child development. This is evidence of the concept of evolutionary common ancestry.
What evidence do scientists use to construct branching trees?
Scientists use a variety of evidence to construct branching trees, including physical features, genetic information, fossil records, and geographic distribution. By analyzing these different types of data, scientists can trace the evolutionary relationships between different species and construct phylogenetic trees that illustrate the pattern of descent and divergence over time.
What is the biochemical evidence that supports evolution?
DNA
Why is it important that scientists conclusions are based on evidence?
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
What is the biochemical evidence that supports biological evolution?
One key piece of biochemical evidence that supports biological evolution is the similarity in DNA sequences among different species. By comparing the DNA sequences of organisms, scientists can uncover evolutionary relationships and common ancestry. Additionally, the presence of vestigial structures and shared biochemical pathways among different species further support the idea of a common evolutionary origin.
How do scientists get empirical evidence?
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
Why are forennsic scientists important?
They are important because they take the evidence that was found and they do tests on it and sometimes they can find more evidence, for example: they could find a finger print or they could find fibres that are important to the investigation.
What are the five evidence of evolution are?
biochemical evidence anatomical evidence fossils vestigial structure embryological evidence
How is biochemical similarities supports evolution?
Biochemical similarities among different species, such as shared genetic sequences and metabolic pathways, provide evidence for a common ancestry and evolutionary relationships. These similarities suggest that organisms have evolved from a common ancestor and have undergone genetic changes over time. Studying biochemical similarities helps scientists understand the processes of evolution and how species have diversified and adapted to their environments.
Biochemical analysts use similarities in what as evidence for evolutionary relationships?
Biochemical analysts use similarities in molecules like DNA, proteins, and enzymes as evidence for evolutionary relationships. The more similarities there are between the molecules of different organisms, the closer their evolutionary relationship is believed to be.
Biochemical analysis uses similarities in as evidence for evolutionary relationships.?
DNA sequences .
Do forensic Scientists trace evidence?
Yes, forensic scientists analyze and trace various types of evidence found at a crime scene to help solve crimes. This can include analyzing DNA, fingerprints, blood spatter patterns, and other physical evidence to assist in criminal investigations.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
