YES
I would say so, it's a crummy show.
No, it is not medically possible or ethical to implant real horns into your skull. Any procedures involving surgical modifications for horn implants would be considered extreme and high-risk, with potential serious health risks and complications. It is important to prioritize your health and well-being over cosmetic modifications.
A good candidate would be the Bumblebee Bat- also called the Hog Nosed Bat. It is the smallest mammal (less than 2 grams) and would be likely to also have a small bladder.
Yes, it would be. Zoology is considered a science as well as veterinary sciences. There is a lot that goes into animal biology so it would be considered a science job. If you're just cleaning up or taking care of animals, however, that's very different.
Yes. The meat of a pig is considered pork, therefore the tongue would also be considered pork.
A class III surgical candidate typically refers to an animal with moderate systemic disease that may increase surgical risk. In this scenario, the one-year-old healthy cat and the one-year-old dog are likely lower-risk candidates for surgery. However, the ten-year-old poodle with severe gingivitis might face higher risks during dental procedures due to age and dental disease, and the three-year-old dog’s orchidectomy would generally be considered a routine procedure with manageable risk. Overall, the suitability for surgery depends on the individual health status and pre-anesthetic evaluation of each animal.
In veterinary medicine, a Class 3 surgical candidate refers to an animal that is considered to be in good health and suitable for surgery with a low risk of complications. These animals typically have no underlying medical conditions that would significantly impact the outcome of the surgery. Class 3 candidates are usually young, healthy animals with normal laboratory values and no pre-existing conditions that would complicate the surgical procedure.
No, it would be considered a procedure, which may be part of a surgical process.
The U.S. would be an obvious candidate.
AA candidate typically refers to an Affirmative Action candidate. Affirmative Action programs are designed to increase representation of minority groups in education and employment. So, an AA candidate would be someone who is considered as part of such initiatives to promote diversity and equal opportunities.
If a state is considered aas hopeless, a candidate might not campaign there. If victory seems certain in a state, the candidate might also skip that state, but would probably make a token appearance or two to avoid offending anyone or to help Congressional candidates win.
Salary for the candidate would not be an expense since the candidate does not receive a salary.
Salary for the candidate would not be an expense since the candidate does not receive a salary.
Salary for the candidate would not be an expense since the candidate does not receive a salary.
they do more work just like a surgical technologists would do.
I believe surgery should require a surgeon and since people who are piercing tongues are rarely surgeons, I would say: no!
No candidate loses until the ballots are counted. How can you be certain that a candidate is a "losing candidate" before the election is held?