A peasant sometimes freeman.
A peasant typically lived in a small house or cottage on land owned by a lord or noble. The house was often simple and made of local materials such as wood or mud. The living conditions were basic, with few amenities and limited space.
A manner was a large farm owned by a noble.
nobles
The noble owned the land, the farmer worked on the land.
The difference depended on place and time. Certainly the two groups overlapped, where they were considered distinct. A gentleman was usually considered to be a person who had a farming estate large enough that he did not work it, but peasant farmers lived and worked on it, a manor. This was distinct from the land owned by a yeoman, who worked his own, rather small, piece of land. In many times, a gentleman was considered to be a member of the nobility, even if he had not title. Without a title he was of lower rank and less consequence than a knight, and considerably lower than a baronet. He might have been called a squire, but the meaning of this term also changed with time. A noble was a member of a noble family, but this included all members, not just the ones who had titles of nobility. With a title of baron or of higher rank, a noble was a peer. Without that title, the noble was a commoner, just as a country gentleman was.
manor
A peasant typically lived in a small house or cottage on land owned by a lord or noble. The house was often simple and made of local materials such as wood or mud. The living conditions were basic, with few amenities and limited space.
A peasant owned no land, so they weren't directly a part of the feudal system. Many peasants worked on lands owned by knights or nobles.
A serf was a peasant who worked on a noble's land in exchange for protection and the use of land. The noble owned the land and had power and authority over the serfs who lived and worked on it.
A manner was a large farm owned by a noble.
nobles
land he owned
The noble owned the land, the farmer worked on the land.
The difference depended on place and time. Certainly the two groups overlapped, where they were considered distinct. A gentleman was usually considered to be a person who had a farming estate large enough that he did not work it, but peasant farmers lived and worked on it, a manor. This was distinct from the land owned by a yeoman, who worked his own, rather small, piece of land. In many times, a gentleman was considered to be a member of the nobility, even if he had not title. Without a title he was of lower rank and less consequence than a knight, and considerably lower than a baronet. He might have been called a squire, but the meaning of this term also changed with time. A noble was a member of a noble family, but this included all members, not just the ones who had titles of nobility. With a title of baron or of higher rank, a noble was a peer. Without that title, the noble was a commoner, just as a country gentleman was.
They're called villeins or serfs, they both have the same meanings. A serf or villein is an un-free peasant bound to a particular land and owned by their Feudal lord.
No, Books A Million is a separate retail chain of bookstores not owned by Barnes and Noble. They operate as a competitor in the book retail industry.
It was called "collectivization," because many small individually owned farms were taken from their owners and collected into one larger farm.