debatable with LED's coming into there own never mind halogens.
Yes, the compact fluorescent light produce more light as compared to the same wattage of incandescent light, it is scientifically proved.
The basic fluorescent light fixture is AC, although there are fluorescent lights powered by DC.
cuzz its better yoo.
They are known as CFL bulbs. It stands for Compact Fluorescent Lamps.
Incandescent lights are expensive to run (they give off a lot of heat was well as light), incandescent lights are much more efficient. However modern LED light bulbs are better (more efficient) than both incandescent and fluorescent lights so in the future you will see a change to the use of these.
Incandescent and halogen light bulbs use more energy than compact fluorescent lights and LED lights. Fluorescent lamps with magnetic ballasts use more energy than fluorescent lamps with electronic ballasts.
No it does not
There is no fluorescent light bulb that is better then any other. That is why they are suggested to be used since they have no different objects.
I would say no. My reasoning is that if incandescent bulbs have as much or more mercury than fluorescent bulbs, the fluorescent industry would be debunking all the reports of a mercury problem.Incandescent lights do not need or use mercury to operate, so there is none in them.Fluorescent lights cannot be made at all without mercury, as it is the glow of mercury ions that produces the UV light inside the fluorescent bulb to excite the phosphor coating to make visible light.
Fluorescent light bulbs use less electricity for the amount of light produced.
A plasma screen TV, the northern lights, and fluorescent light bulbs.
It's pretty hard to know but there may have been over a million lights (like fluorescent light bulbs) in the WTC.