depends. the vikings were bigger and broader probably: the Muslim Sultan used the vikings to guard his palace front doors during Byzantium era. The vikings were like red necks to the 20th power, probably would do about anything to win--if you can think it, they probably did it. Very ruthless.
AA
Yes, the Vikings were worse than the Phoenicians. The word Viking meant Pirate. The Phoenicians were mainly merchants. The two occupations were quite different.
yes
c. the Phoenicians
Vikings beat packers twice!!!!!!
The answer is of course the afro-Phoenicians were the Carthaginians, who were Phoenicians who established their city and trading empire in north Africa (in today's Tunisia).
The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.The Vikings came.
yes
c. the Phoenicians
The Romans were richer than the Vikings.
trading
Snow is worse than rain. Ice is worse than snow.
Hell is worse than purgatory.
"worse"
He had a really bad year on the redskins previously. He also gets a bad grip on the ball. He throws at their feet. If Brett Favre where still playing, He be worse than last year.
Worse than is perfectly acceptable; there's no single word to say worse than. Example: Her housekeeping is worse than mine. Her housekeeping is more terrible than mine. This weather is worse than expected. This weather is more miserable than expected. Or someone offered: the dreaded
Worse than Watergate was created in 2004.
The phrase 'worse than' is used in a comparative sentence.His writing is worse than mine.Words like inferior or second-rate can substitute for the phrase 'worse than'.His writing is inferior to mine.
Hate and loathe are both strong negative emotions, but hate is typically considered to be more intense and deeper than loathe. Hate involves a strong feeling of hostility or aversion towards someone or something, while loathe generally refers to a strong feeling of disgust or intense dislike.