Yes, they can form nitrogen sulfide, NS (sometimes written as N4S4)
It is a pure element, though if you are talking about sulfur in its natural form (S8), then yes it is a pure compound.
Magnesium and sulfur are much more likely than nitrogen and oxygen to form an ionic bond, because the difference in electronegativity between sulfur and magnesium is much greater than the difference in electronegativity between nitrogen and oxygen. Another way of phrasing the reason is that magnesium is a metal and sulfur a nonmetal, while nitrogen and oxygen are both nonmetals.
Sulfur can form both ionic and covalent compounds. For example, sulfur dioxide is a covalent compound whereas sulfides of metals are ionic compounds.
Sulfuric and nitric acids.
Nitrogen in any pure form is an element, not a compound. However, at standard temperature and pressure, nitrogen exists predominantly as divalent molecules.
The compounds in the system nitrogen-sulfur are not ionic.
No. 'Acetic' refers to acetic acid; a compound involving nitrogen is usually called nitro- and sulfur is called thio-.
They form cesium sulfide, and the formula is Ce2S.
Nitrogen sulfur oxide water
They could be formed by the oxidation / combustion of sulfur and nitrogen respectively
Sulfur chloride
Carbon combines with sulfur and nitrogen in order to form acid precipitation.
Nitrogen monosulfide. Mononitrogen monosulfide is an inorganic compound with the formula SN. It is the sulfur analogue of the radical nitric oxide, NO. It can be produced through electrical discharges in mixtures of nitrogen and sulfur compounds, as well as the reaction of nitrogen with sulfur vapor.
It is actually used in bombs
Nitrogen is not a compound, it is an element. Nitrogen is found in many compounds, including all proteins.
Sulfur bonds just like oxygen, so just as carbon and oxygen form the very stable compound CO2, so is it that carbon and sulfur form the stable compound CS2.
They will form a covalent compound.