Depends. If you mean someone wanted to move out and sublet and you refused to let them sublet and they move out anyway can you sue them? It depends on whether the lease allowed them to or not. Generally a lease would have to "PROHIBIT" this; if it just says the landlord won't "unreasonably" deny consent to a sublease, then the landlord has to be reasonable and if it isn't, may lose out. This may vary from state to state. The thing is, that landlords generally are protected in sublease situations because there the tenant is supposed to collect the rent and send it to the landlord, so the original tenant is still responsible. But if the landlord starts accepting rent from the SUB-tenant, then it's possible the landlord will have agreed to release the tenant. This too varies from state to state and based on facts.
You cannot sue for back rent to a tenant who has sublet in the apartment, when you the landlord did not give permission for that to happen in the first place. You have the right to evict the tenant or to force the tenant not to sublet the apartment. You could write into the lease that if you tenant does sublet, a fee can be charged for every month the subletting occurs, until the subletting ends.
This all depends on the terms of your lease. Most apartment complexes do not allow a tenant to sublet. So if the main tenant terminates the tendency, this termination will include everyone. The main tenant is the one who will be responsible to give the landlord back into the apartment.
If you file for modification of the original order and it is granted, yes.
Generally, no. However, the Kentucky officer may be granted a governor's warrant or may be serving extradition, and is then given limited permission by the state of Illinois to take custody of you in that state and deliver you to Kentucky.
Access Granted - 2001 Chingy Pulling Me Back Video was released on: USA: 2006
Access Granted - 2001 Top Back Remix was released on: USA: 6 December 2006
The stepmother would have been able to adopt the child only if the biological mother had voluntarily relinquished her parental rights or had them terminated by the court. Either action is permanent and cannot be reversed. The question is why is the minor child residing with the mother at this time without the permission of the court? If the court has granted permission (which is doubtful), the mother would also have been granted limited custodial rights. You need to file that the child was abandoned by the custodial parent with you for 3 years and that you wish for custody back. Be prepared to prove you are the best for the child. Nothing is permanent in child court.
If a coach is under contract, permission must be granted from the team the coach is under contract to for an interview to take place. Tampering would be when a team goes behind another team's back, so to speak, to talk to a coach under an existing contract. Teams that are still alive in the playoffs can give permission to a coach to talk to another team. If they don't give permission and another team contacts the coach about another job that would be considered tampering.
No. Emancipation is effective from the date that it's granted (if it's granted, which it rarely is), it cannot be made retroactive.
The minimum age requirement for Habbo United States is 13 without parental permission, 12 if you have your parents sign a form and mail it back to Sulake. Underage users without permission will be banned permanently unless your parents mail them back the permission form.
With permission from the copyright holders, yes. Without permission, no.
YES